<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Joomla! powered Site</title>
		<description>Joomla! site syndication</description>
		<link>http://www.justiceraped.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:41:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		
		<item>
			<title>Judicial corruption</title>
			<link>http://www.justiceraped.org/content/view/205/</link>
			<description>1 (http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/workingdocs/doc07/edoc11330.htm#P41_3231):  BARTUMEU CASSANY Jaume, Andorra, SOC  ABURTO BASELGA F&amp;aacute;tima, Spain, SOC  BARNETT Doris, Germany, SOC  B&amp;#304;LGEHAN G&amp;uuml;ls&amp;uuml;n, Turkey, SOC  CHIARUZZI Mauro, San Marino, SOC  CIRCENE Ingrida, Latvia, EPP/CD  CLIVETI Minodora, Romania, SOC  DREYFUS-SCHMIDT Michel, France, SOC  DURRIEU Josette, France, SOC  GARDETTO Jean-Charles, Monaco, EPP/CD  HERKEL Andres, Estonia, EPP/CD  HOLOVATY Serhiy, Ukraine, ALDE  JURGENS Erik, Netherlands, SOC  LENGAGNE Guy, France, SOC  MARCENARO Pietro, Italy, SOC  MITREVA Ilinka,  the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , SOC  PFLUG Johannes, Germany, SOC  SARIKAS Fidias, Cyprus, SOC  UNGUREANU Vasile Ioan D&amp;#259;nu&amp;#355;, Romania, SOC  WOHLWEND Renate, Liechtenstein, EPP/CD   1 (http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/workingdocs/doc07/edoc11330.htm#P41_3232)          SOC: Socialist Group        EPP/CD: Group of the European People&amp;rsquo;s Party        ALDE: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe        EDG: European Democratic Group        UEL: Group of the Unified European Left        NR: not registered in a grouphttp://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/workingdocs/doc07/edoc11330.htm (http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/workingdocs/doc07/edoc11330.htm)  </description>
			<category>Legal Circles - Council of Europe</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:25:26 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Liability of solicitor to pay costs personally</title>
			<link>http://www.justiceraped.org/content/view/204/</link>
			<description>A House of Lords ruling on record since 1940 on appeal from the Court of Appeal (1939) and solicitors with the blessings of the Law Society, the Police, Ministers and the media simply engage in RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS&amp;#39; PROCESSES, all, care of condescending and participating in the arrogant fraud on &amp;#39;the serfs&amp;#39;: - the taxpayers.H.L. (E)              MYERS              APPELLANT                                   Oct. 19,23,              24,25,30 :             v                                                 Dec 5             ELMAN              RESPONDENT                                                                                                                         Solicitor              - Professional misconduct &amp;ndash; Delivering defence              suspected to be false &amp;ndash;                                                 Filing inadequate              affidavit of documents &amp;ndash; Proceedings conducted by clerk &amp;ndash;                                                  Liability              of solicitor to pay costs personally &amp;ndash; Jurisdiction of judge.                                      Essential reading for all victims of solicitors and the legal          circles / courts generally.         from here (http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4suckers.htm#Solicitors).                                                     The Jurisdiction of the Court to order a solicitor to pay the          costs of proceedings is not limited to cases where he personally has been guilty of          misconduct, but extends to a case where his managing clerk, to whom he has entrusted the          necessary work, is guilty of misconduct, as for example, in the preparation of and filing          of inadequate affidavits of documents. The jurisdiction is not limited to deal with cases          of misconduct or default, but extends to the case where costs have been improperly          incurred or without reasonable cause or have proved fruitless by reason of undue delay in          proceeding under a judgement or order.                                 An order for discovery requires the client to give information          in writing and on oath of all documents which are or have been in his          possession or power, whether he is bound to produce them or not, but as a client cannot be          expected to realise the whole scope of that obligation without the aid and advice of his          solicitor, the latter has a peculiar duty as an officer of the Court carefully to          investigate the position, and, as far as possible, see that the order is complied with.          The solicitor cannot simply allow the client to make whatever affidavit of documents he          thinks fit, nor can he escape the responsibility of careful investigation or supervision.          If the client will not give him the information which he is entitled to require, or if the          client insists on swearing an affidavit which the solicitor knows to be imperfect, the          solicitor&amp;#39;s duty is to withdraw from the case. A solicitor who has innocently put upon the          file an affidavit by his client which he subsequently discovers to be false, owes a duty          to the Court to put the matter right at the earliest moment if he continues to act as          solicitor on the record.                                       Decision of the Court of Appeal ( reported sub nom Myers v Rothfield          [1939] IK B 109 ) reversed. Lord Russell of Killowen dissenting on the          ground that the evidence submitted to the House failed in his opinion to establish any of          the charges against the managing clerk, and, therefore, the order against the respondent          could not stand.                                     ****************************************                                 (i)         Conspiracy - The crime of from here (http://www.uk-human-rights.org/confraud.htm#qualifies) to the page where we rxpose ORGANISED          COPNSTRUCTIVE FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES]                                 Through the          above deliberations and ruling / judgement their Lordships made it abundantly clear that          solicitors owe a duty to the Court (to Justice in essence) to ensure that NO FALSEHOODS          ARE ADVANCED, AIDED OR SUPPORTED by Officers of the Supreme Court. However, there exist          the issues of power over others, greed and temptation, such as invitations to entertain          criminally motivated and secured impositions on targeted parties. WE HAVE SUCH EVIDENCE; a          barrister inviting through a deposition, an AFFIDAVIT SERVED   LODGED AT COURT, a          Judge of the Supreme Court (RCJ - London) to ignore the law, and to &amp;#39;deny rights assured          in law&amp;#39; to a targeted serf, one, who, in accordance with the teachings by examples stated          in the work of the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything, does NOT QUALIFY          FOR JUSTICE, BECAUSE OF HIS BACKGROUND   BELIEFS. Such elements, years before the late          Stephen Knight published his well-researched work on &amp;#39;The Brotherhood&amp;#39;, the          Freemasons and activities by members who, apparently, merit no consideration by the          hierarchy of &amp;#39;The Brotherhood&amp;#39;, as an offended &amp;#39;dissident&amp;#39; spoke of to the researcher. http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4suckers.htm#1940 (http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4suckers.htm#1940)  </description>
			<category>Legal Circles - Barristers</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:07:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty</title>
			<link>http://www.justiceraped.org/content/view/203/</link>
			<description>  The abolition of Britainby The Reform TreatyPassed with a 138 majority http://www.eutruth.org.uk/ (http://www.eutruth.org.uk/)  MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it.The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU parliament has no power and is a sham.Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution.This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital.This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was largely unreported by our controlled press and media.The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008Parliament allocated 29 days, now reduced to 12, to discuss this treaty in February (not much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final ratification vote this month. The Queen, the EU&amp;#39;s most loyal supporter, plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five treaties.No referendumGerman Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel both his promised referendum, and his General Election. Anti-EU  groups have encouraged us to call for a referendum precisely because the EU has already prohibited it. They know we are wasting our efforts: our four party leaderships take their orders from the EU, not from the voters.How to fightThe real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP&amp;#39;s and get a majority against. MP&amp;#39;s have been selected on the Party list system over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated traitors will suffer severely.)Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions here (http://www.eutruth.org.uk/) , top left)The EU remains illegalach of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.The Countdown to abolitionWhereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain&amp;rsquo;s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal act on the statute book.The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force; they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will get in the future.Westminster&amp;#39;s five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed.Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to succeed. The success of the EU&amp;#39;s Frankfurt School subversion techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.You have 9 months leftTreason is the most serious of all Britain&amp;rsquo;s crimes. You have just 11 months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship.Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don&amp;rsquo;t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself.There are ways to stop the EU - see  Your Campaigns  on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP&amp;#39;s and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.Copy of the EU&amp;#39;s Timetable at the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6901353.stm) .Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for download (http://www.eutruth.org.uk/2009treaty.pdf) Then check it at the German Parliament here (http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/EN/Artikel/2006/10/2006-10-11-pk-barroso-merkel-nach-kabinett__en.html) . </description>
			<category>News - Latest</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:00:14 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>China and America: The Tibet Human Rights PsyOp</title>
			<link>http://www.justiceraped.org/content/view/202/</link>
			<description>  China and America: The Tibet Human Rights PsyOp   by Michel Chossudovsky      Global  Research (http://www.globalresearch.ca/), April 13, 2008The human rights issue has become the centerfold of media  disinformation.  China is no model of human rights but neither are the US and  its indefectible British ally, responsible for extensive war crimes and human  rights violations in Iraq and around the World.  The US and its allies, which  uphold the practice of torture, political assassinations and the establishment  of secret detention camps, continue to be presented to public opinion as a model  of Western democracy to be emulated by developing countries, in contrast to  Russia, Iran, North Korea and the People&amp;#39;s Republic of China.  Human Rights  Double Standards  While China&amp;#39;s alleged human rights violations in relation to  Tibet are highlighted, the recent wave of killings in Iraq and Palestine are not  mentioned. The Western media has barely acknowledged the Fifth  anniversary  of  Iraq&amp;#39;s  Liberation  and the balance sheet of the US sponsored killings and  atrocities perpetrated against an entire population, in the name of a  global  war on terrorism .   There are more than 1.2 million Iraqi civilian deaths, 3  million wounded. The United Nations High Commission for Refugees  ()  (http://www.unhcr.org/news/NEWS/47597e434.html)indicates a figure of 2.2 million Iraqi refugees who  have fled their country and 2.4 million  internally displaced persons :      Iraq&amp;rsquo;s population at the time of  the US invasion in March 2003 was roughly 27 million, and today it is  approximately 23 million. Elementary arithmetic indicates that currently over  half the population of Iraq are either refugees, in need of emergency aid,  wounded, or dead.  (Dahr  Jamail, Global Research, December 2007 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=7639)) The Geopolitical Chessboard There are deep-seated geopolitical objectives behind the  campaign against the Chinese leadership.  US-NATO-Israeli war plans in relation to Iran are at an  advanced state of readiness. China has economic ties as well as a far-reaching  bilateral military cooperation agreement with Iran. Moreover, China is also an  ally of Russia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan in  the context of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Since 2005, Iran has  an observer member status within the SCO. In turn, the SCO has ties to the Collective Security Treaty  Organization (CSTO), an overlapping military cooperation agreement between  Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Uzbekistan,  Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic,  Tajikistan.  In October of last year the Collective Security Treaty  Organization (CSTO) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) signed a  Memorandum of Understanding, laying the foundations for military cooperation  between the two organizations. This SCO-CSTO agreement, barely mentioned by the  Western media, involves the creation of a full-fledged military alliance between  China, Russia and the member states of SCO/CSTO. It is worth noting that the  SCTO and the SCO held joint military exercises in 2006, which coincided with  those conducted by Iran. (For further details see Michel Chossudovsky, Russia and Central  Asian Allies Conduct War Games in Response to US Threats, Global Research,  August 2006)  (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=3056)In the context of US war plans directed against Iran,  the US is also intent upon weakening Iran&amp;#39;s allies, namely Russia and China. In  the case of China, Washington is seaking to disrupt Beijing&amp;#39;s bilateral ties  with Tehran as well as Iran&amp;#39;s rapprochement with the SCO, which has its  headquarters in Beijing.   China is an ally of Iran. Washington&amp;#39;s intention is to use  Beijing&amp;#39;s alleged human rights violations as a pretext to target China, an ally  of Iran.   In this regard,  a military operation directed against Iran can  only succeed if the structure of military alliances which link Iran to China and  Russia is disrupted. This is something which German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck  understood in relation to the structure of competing military alliances  prevalent prior to World War I. The Triple Alliance was an agreement between  Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Italy formed in 1882. In 1907, an  Anglo-Russian agreement paved the way for the formation of the Triple Entente  made up of France, the U.K. and Russia. The Triple Alliance ultimately  came to an end in 1914, when Italy withdrew from the alliance and declared its  neutrality, thereby paving the way for the outbreak of World War  I. History points to the importance of competing military alliances.  In  the present context, the US and its NATO partners are seaking to undermine the  formation of a cohesive Eurasian SCO-CSTO military alliance, which could  effectively challenge and contain US-NATO military expansionism in Eurasia,  combining the military capabilities not only of Russia and China, but also those  of several former Soviet republics including Belarus, Armenia,  Kazakhstan, Tajikistan Uzbekistan and the Kyrgyz Republic.  Encircling China With the exception of its Northern frontier which borders on  the Russian Federation, Mongolia and Kazakhstan, China is surrounded by US  military bases.    Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Global Military Alliance: Encircling Russia  and China, Global Research, 10 May 2007 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=5605)) Weakening China from within: Covert Support to Secessionist  Movements Consistent with its policy of weakening and ultimately  fracturing the People&amp;#39;s Republic of China, Washington supports secessionist  movements both in Tibet as wall as in the Xinjiang-Uigur autonomous region which  borders onto North Eastern Pakistan and Afghanistan.  In Xinjiang-Uigur, Pakistani intelligence (ISI), acting in  liaison with the CIA, supports several Islamist organizations. The latter  include the Islamic Reformist Party, the East Turkestan National Unity Alliance,  the Uigur Liberation Organization and the Central Asian Uigur Jihad Party.  Several of these Islamic organizations have received support and training from  Al Qaeda, which is a US sponsored intelligence asset.  The declared objective of  these Chinese-based Islamic organizations is the  establishment of an Islamic  caliphate in the region  (For further details see Michel Chossudovsky, America&amp;#39;s War on Terrorism, Global Research,  Montreal, 2005, Chapter 2 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html)).  The caliphate would integrate Uzbekistan, Tajikistan,  Kyrgyzstan (West Turkestan) and the Uigur autonomous region of China (East  Turkestan) into a single political entity.  The  caliphate project  encroaches upon Chinese territorial  sovereignty. Supported by various Wahabi  foundations  from the Gulf States,  secessionism on China&amp;rsquo;s Western frontier is, once again, consistent with U.S.  strategic interests in Central Asia. Meanwhile, a powerful U.S.-based lobby is  channeling support to separatist forces in Tibet. By tacitly promoting the secession of the Xinjiang-Uigur region  (using Pakistan&amp;rsquo;s ISI as a  go-between ), Washington is attempting to trigger a  broader process of political destabilization and fracturing of the People&amp;rsquo;s  Republic of China. In addition to these various covert operations, the U.S. has  established military bases in Afghanistan and in several of the former Soviet  republics, directly on China&amp;rsquo;s Western border. The militarization of the South China Sea and of the Taiwan  Straits is also an integral part of this strategy.(Ibid) (http://www.globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html)  The Lhasa Riots The violent riots in Tibet&amp;#39;s capital in mid-March were a  carefully staged event. In their immediate aftermath, a media disinformation  campaign supported by political statements by Western leaders directed against  China was launched.  There are indications that US intelligence played a behind the  scenes role in what several observers have described as a carefully premeditated  operation.(See our analysis below).   The Lhasa event in mid-March was not a spontaneous  peaceful   protest movement as described by the Western media  The riots involving a gang  of mobsters were premeditated. They had been carefully planned. Tibetan  activists in India associated with the Dalai Lama&amp;#39;s government in exile  hinted  they were indeed expecting the disturbances. But they refuse to elaborate how  they knew or who their collaborators were  (Guerilla  News (http://www.guerrillanews.com/headlines/16999/Deathtoll_rises_to_80_in_Tibet))  The images do not suggest a mass protest rally but rather a  rampage led by a few hundred individuals. Buddhist monks were involved in the  rampage. According to China Daily (March 31, 2008), the Tibetan Youth Congress  (TYC) based in India, considered by China as a   hard-line organization   affiliated to the Dalai Lama, was also behind the violence. The TYC&amp;#39;s training  camps are funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). (See  the text of the Congressional  Hearings regarding NED support to the  TYC (http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa88166.000/hfa88166_0.HTM)) People&amp;#39;s Daily, March 22, 2008 (http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/6378826.html))  Meanwhile, the Western media casually described the looting and  arson as a  peaceful demonstration  which the Chinese authorities suppressed  with the use of force. There are no accurate reports (both from Chinese and  Western news sources) on the number of casualties resulting from the Chinese  police operation launched to repress the riots. Western press reports point to a  large scale deployment of more than 1000 soldiers and police in armored vehicles  in the Tibetan capital. Businesses, schools were attacked, cars were set  on fire. According to Chinese reports, there are 22 dead and 623 injured.   Rioters set fire at more than 300 locations, mostly private houses, stores and  schools, and smashed vehicles and damaged public facilities.   The planning of the riots was coordinated with the media  disinformation campaign, which accused the Chinese authorities of having  instigated the looting and arson.  The Dalai Lama accused Beijing of  disguising  its troops as monks  to give the impression that Buddhist monks were behind the  riots. The claims were based on a  four year old photograph of soldiers dressing  up as monks in a theatrical stage performance (See South China Morning Post, 4  April 2008).   The mainland newspaper {People&amp;#39;s Daily] said the security  forces quelling riots in Lhasa could not possibly have been wearing the uniforms  shown in the photograph because they were summer uniforms, unsuitable for the  cold March weather. It also said the PAP had changed to new  uniforms in 2005, which feature shoulder emblems. The armed officers shown in  the photograph were in old-style uniforms which had been phased out after 2005.  ...  Xinhua said the photograph was taken during a performance years ago, when  soldiers borrowed robes from monks before performing on stage.  (Ibid) The Dalai Lama&amp;#39;s claim that the Chinese authorities had  instigated the riots, quoted in the Western media,  is supported by a statement  of a former Communist Party official Mr. Ruan Ming who  claims the CCP carefully  staged the incidents in Tibet in order to force the Dalai Lama to resign and to  justify future repression of the Tibetans. Mr. Ruan Ming was a speechwriter for  former CCP General Secretary Hu Yaobang.  (quoted in The Epoch Times) 2003 photograph used by the media  to accuse China of having deliberately instigated the riots.  This [2003] photo was apparently made when  soldiers were ordered to put on robes to play as actors in a  movie. See http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/chinese-orchestrating-riots-tibet.htm (http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/chinese-orchestrating-riots-tibet.htm)The  Role of US Intelligence  The organization of the Lhasa riots are part of a consistent  pattern. They constitute an attempt to trigger ethnic conflict in China. They  serve US foreign policy interests.   To what extent has US intelligence played an undercover role in  the current wave of protests regarding Tibet?   Given the covert nature of intelligence operations, there is no  tangible evidence of direct CIA involvement. However, there are various  Tibetan organizations linked to the Tibet  government in exile  which are known  to be supported by the CIA and/or by the CIA&amp;#39;s civilian front organization, the  National Endowment for Democracy (NED).    The CIA&amp;#39;s involvement in channeling covert support to the  Tibetan secessionist movement goes back to the mid-1950s. The Dalai Lama was on  the CIA&amp;#39;s payroll from the late 1950s until 1974:   The CIA conducted a large scale covert action campaign against  the communist Chinese in Tibet starting in 1956. This led to a disastrous bloody  uprising in 1959, leaving tens of thousands of Tibetans dead, while the Dalai  Lama and about 100,000 followers were forced to flee across the treacherous  Himalayan passes to India and Nepal. The CIA established a secret military training camp for the  Dalai Lama&amp;#39;s resistance fighters at Camp Hale near Leadville, Colorado, in the  US. The Tibetan guerrillas were trained and equipped by the CIA for guerrilla  warfare and sabotage operations against the communist Chinese. The US-trained guerrillas regularly carried out raids into  Tibet, on occasions led by CIA-contract mercenaries and supported by CIA planes.  The initial training program ended in December 1961, though the camp in Colorado  appears to have remained open until at least 1966. The CIA Tibetan Task Force created by Roger E McCarthy,  alongside the Tibetan guerrilla army, continued the operation codenamed  ST  CIRCUS  to harass the Chinese occupation forces for another 15 years until 1974,  when officially sanctioned involvement ceased. McCarthy, who also served as head of the Tibet Task Force at  the height of its activities from 1959 until 1961, later went on to run similar  operations in Vietnam and Laos. By the mid-1960s, the CIA had switched its strategy from  parachuting guerrilla fighters and intelligence agents into Tibet to  establishing the Chusi Gangdruk, a guerrilla army of some 2,000 ethnic Khamba  fighters at bases such as Mustang in Nepal. This base was only closed down in 1974 by the Nepalese  government after being put under tremendous pressure by Beijing. After the Indo-China War of 1962, the CIA developed a close  relationship with the Indian intelligence services in both training and  supplying agents in Tibet.  (Richard  Bennett, Tibet, the &amp;#39;great game&amp;#39; and the CIA, Global Research, March  2008 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=8442)) The National Endowment for Democracy (NED)   The National Endowment for Democracy (NED),  which channels  financial support to pro-US opposition groups around the World has played a  significant role in triggering  velvet revolutions  which serve Washington&amp;#39;s  geopolitical and economic interests.   The NED, although not formally part of the CIA, performs an  important intelligence function within the arena of civilian political parties  and NGOs. It was created in 1983, when the CIA was being accused of covertly  bribing politicians and setting up phony civil society front organizations.  According to Allen Weinstein, who was responsible for setting up the NED during  the Reagan Administration:  A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years  ago by the CIA.  (&amp;#39;Washington Post&amp;#39;, Sept. 21, 1991).  The NED operates through four core institutes: the National  Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDIIA), the International Republican  Institute (http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1481.html) (IRI), the American Center for International Labor Solidarity  (ACILS), and the Center for International Private Enterprise. The NED  provided funds to  the  civil society  organizations in Venezuela, which  initiated an attempted coup against President Hugo Chavez. In Haiti, the NED  supported the opposition groups behind the armed insurrection which contributed  to unseating President Bertrand Aristide in February 2004. The coup d&amp;#39; Etat in  Haiti was the result of a carefully staged military-intelligence operation. (See  Michel Chossudovsky, The Destabilization of Haiti, Global Research,  February 2004 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle code=CHO20050610 articleId=56)) The NED funds a number of Tibet organizations both within China  and abroad. The most prominent pro-Dalai Lama Tibet independence organization  funded by the NED is the International Campaign for Tibet (ICT), founded in  Washington in 1988. The ICT has offices in Washington, Amsterdam, Berlin and  Brussels. Distinct from other NED funded Tibet organizations,  the ICT has a  close cozy and   overlapping  relationship with the NED and the US State  Department::  Some of ICT&amp;rsquo;s directors are also integral members of the  &amp;lsquo;democracy promoting&amp;rsquo; establishment, and include Bette Bao Lord (who is the  chair of Freedom House, and a director of Freedom Forum), Gare A. Smith (who has  previously served as principal deputy assistant secretary in the U.S. Department  of State&amp;rsquo;s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor), Julia Taft (who is a  former director of the NED, the former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State and  Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues, has worked for USAID, and has also  served as the President and CEO of InterAction), and finally, Mark Handelman  (who is also a director of the National Coalition for Haitian Rights, an  organization whose work is ideologically linked to the NED&amp;rsquo;s longstanding  interventions in Haiti).  The ICT&amp;rsquo;s board of advisors also presents two individuals who  are closely linked to the NED, Harry Wu, and Qiang Xiao (who is the former  executive director of the NED-funded Human Rights in China).  Like their board of directors, ICT&amp;rsquo;s international council of  advisors includes many &amp;lsquo;democratic&amp;rsquo; notables like Vaclav Havel, Fang Lizhi (who  in 1995 &amp;ndash; at least &amp;ndash; was a board member of Human Rights in China), Jose  Ramos-Horta (who serves on the international advisory board for the Democracy  Coalition Project), Kerry Kennedy (who is a director of the NED-funded China  Information Center), Vytautas Landsbergis (who is an international patron of the  British-based neoconservative Henry Jackson Society &amp;ndash; see Clark, 2005), and  until her recent death, the &amp;ldquo;mid-wife of the neocons&amp;rdquo; Jeane J. Kirkpatrick (who  was also linked to &amp;lsquo;democratic&amp;rsquo; groups like Freedom House and the Foundation for  the Defense of Democracies). (Michael Barker,  Democratic Imperialism : Tibet, China, and the  National Endowment for Democracy  Global Research, August 13,  2007 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=6530)) (L to R) Elie Weisel, The Dalai Lama, NED chairman  Carl Gershman, and Lowell Thomas Jr. (Washington DC  2005)Other NED funded Tibet organizations include the Students  for a Free Tibet (SFT) referred to earlier. The SFT was founded in 1994 in New  York City  as a project of US Tibet Committee and the NED-financed International  Campaign for Tibet (ICT). The SFT is most known for unfurling a 450 foot banner  atop the Great Wall in China; calling for a free Tibet.  (F. William Engdahl, Risky Geopolitical Game: Washington Plays &amp;lsquo;Tibet  Roulette&amp;rsquo; with China, Global Research, April 2008) (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=8625). The SFT together  with five other Tibet organizations proclaimed last January  the start of a  &amp;#39;Tibetan people&amp;#39;s uprising  ... and co-founded a temporary office in charge of  coordination and financing.  ( Ibid)   The NED also funds the Tibet Multimedia Center for  &amp;ldquo;information dissemination that addresses the struggle for human rights and  democracy in Tibet,&amp;rdquo; also based in Dharamsala. And the NED finances the Tibetan  Center for Human Rights and Democracy.(Ibid) There is a division of tasks between the CIA and the NED. While  the CIA provides covert support to armed paramilitary rebel groups and terrorist  organizations, the NED finances  civilian   political parties and non  governmental organizations with a view to instating American  democracy  around  the World. The NED constitutes, so to speak, the CIA&amp;#39;s  civilian arm .  CIA-NED interventions in different part of the World are characterized by a  consistent pattern, which is applied in numerous countries. PsyOp: Discrediting the Chinese Leadership The short-term objective is to discredit the Chinese leadership  in the months leading up to the Beijing Olympic games, while also using the  Tibet campaign to divert public opinion from the Middle East war and the war  crimes committed by the US, NATO and Israel.  China&amp;#39;s alleged human rights violations are highlighted as a  distraction, to provide a human face to the US led war in the Middle East.  The US sponsored war plans directed against Iran are now acknowledged  and justified due to Tehran&amp;#39;s noncompliance with the demands of the   international community . With Tibet making the headlines, the real  humanitarian crisis in the Middle East is not front page news.  More generally, the issue of human rights is distorted:  realities are turned upside down, the extensive crimes committed by the US and  its coalition partners are either concealed or justified as a means to  protecting society against terrorists.  A  double standards  in the assessment of human rights  violations has been instated. In the Middle East, the killing of civilians is  categorized as collateral damage. It is justified as part of the  global war on  terrorism . The victims are said to be responsible for their own deaths.  The Olympic Torch  Carefully timed demonstrations on China&amp;#39;s human rights  violations in Western capitals have been set in motion.  A partial boycott of the Olympic games seems to be underway.  French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner (a strong protagonist of US  interests who has a relationship to the Bilderbergs), has called for a boycott  of the opening ceremonies of the Olympics. Kouchner said the idea should be  discussed at a meeting of EU foreign ministers  The Olympic torch was lit at a ceremony in Greece, which was  disrupted by  pro-Tibet activists . The event was sponsored by  Reporters  Without Borders , an organization known to have links to US intelligence. (See,  Diana  Barahona, Reporters Without Borders Unmasked, May 2005 (http://www.counterpunch.org/barahona05172005.html)).  Reporters Without  Borders  also receives support for the National Endowment for Democracy  (NED).  The Olympic Torch is symbolic. The Psychological operation  (PsyOp) consists in targeting the Olympic torch in the months leading up the  Beijing Olympic games. At each phase of this process, the Chinese leadership is  denigrated by the Western media.  Global Economic Implications  The Tibet campaign directed against the Chinese leadership  could backlash.  We are at the crossroads of the most serious economic and  financial crisis of modern history. The unfolding economic crisis bears a direct  relationship to the US sponsored military adventure in the Middle East and  Central Asia.  China plays a strategic role with regard to US military  expansionism. So far it has not exercised its veto power in the United  Nations  Security Council in relation to the several US sponsored UNSC resolutions  directed against Iran.  China also plays a central role in the global economy and  financial system.  Resulting from an accumulated trade surplus with the US,   China&amp;#39;s now holds 1.5 trillion dollars worth of US debt instruments (including  US Treasury bills). It has the ability to significantly disrupt international  currency markets. The US dollar would plunge to even lower levels, were China to  sell off its dollar denominated debt holdings.(For further details see: F. William Engdahl, op cit)  (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=8625) Moreover, China is the largest producer of a wide range of  manufactured goods which constitute, for the West, a significant share of  monthly household consumption. Western retail giants rely on the continued and  uninterrupted flow of cheap labor industrial commodities from China.  For the Western countries, China&amp;#39;s insertion into the  structures of global trade, investment, finance and intellectual property rights  under the World Trade Organization (WTO) is absolutely crucial. Were Beijing to  decide to curtail its  Made in China  manufacturing exports to the US, America&amp;#39;s  fragile and declining manufacturing base would not be able to fill the gap, at  least in the short run.  Moreover, the US and its coalition partners including the UK,  Germany, France and Japan have important investment interests in China. In 2001,  the US and China signed a bilateral trading agreement prior to the accession of  China to the WTO. This agreement allows US investors, including the major Wall  Street financial institutions, to position themselves in Shanghai&amp;#39;s financial  and trading system as well as in China&amp;#39;s domestic banking market.  While China is, in some regards, the West&amp;#39;s  cheap labor  industrial colony , China&amp;#39;s relationship to the global trading system is by no  means cast in steel.  China&amp;#39;s relationship to global capitalism has its roots in the   Open Door Policy  initially formulated in 1979. (Michel Chossudovsky, Towards Capitalist Restoration. Chinese  Socialism after Mao, Macmillian, London, 1986 (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Towards-Capitalist-Restoration/Michel-Chossudovsky/e/9780312811341/?itm=10), chapters 7 and 8)   Since the 1980s, China has become the main supplier of  industrial goods to Western markets. Any threat against China and/or military  venture directed against China&amp;#39;s Eurasian allies including Iran could  potentially disrupt China&amp;#39;s extensive trade in manufactured  goods. China&amp;#39;s export oriented industrial base is the source of  tremendous wealth formation in the advanced capitalist economies. Where does the  wealth of the Walton family, owners of WalMart, originate? WalMart does produce  anything. It imports cheap labor commodities  Made in China  and resells them in  the US retail market at up to ten times their factory price. This  process of  import led development  has allowed the Western  industrialised   countries to close down a large part of their manufacturing outlets. In turn,  China&amp;#39;s industrial sweat shops serve to generate multibillion dollar profits for  Western corporations, including the retail giants, which purchase and/or  outsource their production to China.  Any threat of a military nature directed against China could  have devastating economic consequences, far beyond the familiar upward spiral in  the price of crude oil.http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=8673 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va aid=8673) </description>
			<category>News - Latest</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A Sovereign Man Takes off the Gloves: Tyrants Leave Office Or Face Ruination</title>
			<link>http://www.justiceraped.org/content/view/201/35/</link>
			<description>A Sovereign Man Takes off the Gloves: Tyrants Leave Office Or  Face Ruination.Author: Raymond Ronald Karczewski&amp;copy; -- A Living  ChristI am one man, living in the Constitutional Republic known as  the united states of America.I am a Living, Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood,  Sentient, Natural Man, a Son of God, a Servant of Truth. a simple man of  Truth, a Christ. (That is all Jesus of Nazareth was -- A simple Man of Truth,  a Living, breathing, manifestation of Truth which threatened the Satanic  Powers of His time, notwithstanding the subsequent all encompassing mind  control onslaught directed toward the average nondiscriminating mass  civilized mind).I am a 70 year old, retired Police Sergeant, living on  pension. Such description satisfies my material existence, yet spiritually, I  am a Christ. I live ashamed of my modern-day Law Enforcement brothers  who appear to have sold their souls, their integrity for the almighty   Satanic  paycheck.I am ashamed too, of my slumbering brothers and  sisters who go about their daily lives, living in fear of their government  officials, those whom they have elected to office to carry out the policies  of the Sovereign People, the True Government. I am ashamed of  spineless sheeple, who live in ignorance of their own Christ nature and  who chose the comfort of slavery to the enlivening momentum of freedom,  of Divine Awareness, the natural holistic outcome of Peace and Love.I  am one man, but I have, for these twelve years on the Internet  attempted to  demonstrate what such a solitary man, unsupported though he may be, can do  when standing up, exposing and disintegrating the bubble of illusion that  surrounds such Satanic Corporate and Governmental Leaders in exerting their  unholy power over the MASS MIND.I understand how these simple statements  may be heard by each of you.  Impossible you say! Outlandish you say!  Extraordinary to say the least! What I am, and what each of you are is a  simple Son of God, possessed of Divine Awareness, the essence of Supreme  Intelligence. I know who I am. You live in Spiritual Amnesia of your True  Estate. That is whY I call you CHRISTS WITH AMNESIA.It is time to  bring down the curtain upon a Satanic Government which has held sway over the  mind of civilized man since the dawn of Civilization.It is time to  withdraw all of your individual support, to BOYCOTT, BYCOTT, BOYCOTT all  elements of a government which no longer serves, but trannizes.It is  time to bring an end to the banking industry, the Internal Revenue Service,  the debt-based Federal Reserve and its worthless paper money conjured out of  nothing. It is time to bring down the Credit System which makes slaves out of  abled body sovereign men and women.It is time to evict the Satanic  United Nations from our shores, to withdraw from membership.It is  time to bring down the International Monetary Fund. It is time to tell the  Creditors who hold the national debt to  take a hike  from a debt you didn&amp;#39;t  create.It is time to disavow your 14th Amendment Status which have  stripped away your Sovereignty and transformed you into property of the  State, Wards of the State, Slaves to the State, property, chattel,  human resources to be used and abused by the Master Satanic  elitists.That&amp;#39;s your life, yet you live in denial, like ostriches with  your heads in the sand.I&amp;#39;ve had enough of this nonsense. The question  is, HAVE YOU???Do you want to know how to LIBERATE yourselves? See what  I have done.  What I have done in my life, you too, can do in your  life. See:  http://www.arkenterprises.com/index.html (http://www.arkenterprises.com/index.html) http://www.arkenterprises.com/index11.html (http://www.arkenterprises.com/index11.html) http://www.arkenterprises.com/index12.html (http://www.arkenterprises.com/index12.html) SOVEREIGNTY:  USE IT OR LOSE ITRaymond Ronald Karczewski&amp;copy;</description>
			<category>Untold Truths - Protocols</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:12:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
