The material facts and realities related in the document published below, by necessity cover issues that are most important, when one considers the purpose of the studies and the research, the deponent was caused to engage in following the events that brought about and CAUSED THE AWAKENING THE DEPONENT benefited from, as a result of the unacceptable states he was subjected to when SEEKING JUSTICE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, the first modern DEMOCRACY resting and founded on the RULE OF LAW, created by the elected representatives of the mature citizens of such states, countries, societies.

Readers, visitors are requested to  bear in mind the fact that other considerations, were at play when settling the deposition as recorded and presented below. The most important factor which READERS MUST NOT LET SIGHT OF, should be the very element of :-

“NO OTHER MEANS OR OPTION through which TO SEEK CORRECTION OF THE ORIGINAL WRONG the victim of dishonesty and the imposed states he found himself in, when acting and expecting others to act as he, while of opinion / a believer in the false promotions he was benefiting from, when a student of the Reverend Canon Newham creation and legacy, ”The English High Scho0l’ of Nicosia, Cyprus from 1951 to 1956.



 when challenging the activities stated therein.


I, Andrew Yiannides of 16A Woodside Road, Wood Green London N22 5HU in the London Borough of Haringey, MAKE OATH and say as follows:-

  1. Save where otherwise expressed I depose to the facts set out in this my affidavit from my own knowledge, from documents that I had and or have in my possession, from documents I accessed on the Internet, and from conversations I had with any other party referred to herein, who in the past confirmed the factuality of what I repeat, and I firmly believe to be true because conversations and or matters herein deposed of by me were not at all relevant times denied and or challenged by such others as I refer to.
  2. I am the second born to Charita Tzierkalli Katsantoni of Karavas Cyprus through her marriage to Kyriacos Petrou Joannides of Yialousa, Cyprus. The first born was Maria Kyriacou Joannidou, Antoniades after her marriage to Yiannis Antoniades. Mother gave birth to another daughter after me, Despina, and two younger brothers, Costas and Savvas, in that order. I am, therefore, the eldest son and the elder brother of Mrs Despina Englezakis who was declared insolvent, allegedly, and thereafter pronounced bankrupt care of the party who set the wheels in motion, namely Haringey Council, a Local Authority, the staff and officers of which engaged and indulged in many acts of fraudulent misrepresentations and promotions of falsehoods, including the creation and promotion of false instruments, such as I am to relate and attach copies of, to this my affidavit, as I proceed.
  3. The brief introduction to the family background and inter-party relations is called for in view of the nature of the states I am to address herein below. Father and Maria were the first to come to the United Kingdom care of an invitation from father’s elder brother Eftychios. Mother, Despina and the youngest, Savvas, followed some months later. Before leaving for the United Kingdom, mother arranged for Costas, who also secured a place at the English School in Nicosia to be registered as a boarder and her brother Yiannis Katsantonis was granted powers of authority to deal with Costas’ needs and the management of her lemon orchard at Karavas. Owing to uncle Yiannis failure to remit the nominal school and boarding fees, Costas was asked to leave the boarding house and he went to stay with our aunt Katerina in Kyrenia. I was myself expelled from the English School before the last term in my final year because of a strike a number of senior students organised after an ex student was arrested by the Security forces for alleged involvement in the ongoing demands for independence for Cyprus as were ongoing in other parts of the British Empire. Arrangements were afoot for Costas to secure a passport, which matters I was dealing with when I was myself expelled from the English School and I went to work for uncle Spyropoullos in Famagusta. I hasten to add that I had been working for uncle Spyropoullos throughout my summer vacations as of the year of my graduation from junior school, for I needed to secure the necessary funds to meet the cost of my secondary / High School fees, the books and other expenses attached to my education and living expenses. I applied also for a passport for myself after I was expelled and the contact details I gave to the authorities were the Famagusta office where I was working.
  4. Costas’ passport presented no problems but when it came to the passport I applied for, for myself, I was informed that it was not to be delivered by registered mail; l was directed to go to Nicosia in order to collect it personally. When I arrived, at the appropriate office I was instructed to go for the collection, I was taken to an inner office and I was brutally beaten up by a security officer and taken into custody at the notorious (as I got to know later) Omorphita police station without benefiting from any medical treatment for the extensive and painful injuries I sustained. I was held in custody for well in excess of the maximum period while nature took its course for the healing process. In the meantime I was benefiting from regular interrogation interviews conducted by security British officers who were using auxiliary Turkish guards as interpreters whose grasp of the English language, and in particular one whose grasp of both English and Greek left much to be desired. The lack of proper information as to my background as a graduate (so to speak) of the English School helped me keep my sanity, thanks to the funny elements and parts of the translations / interpretations the interviewers-interrogators were benefiting from. The aforesaid input and observation by way of the lack of true information and the application of common sense to such issues as I am to relate and proceed with the realities within the Joannides household as arranged by the fraud of a husband and the father of five whose wife suffered quietly while engaging in all manner of activities to raise the essential funds attached to the needs of the five children she gave birth to care of the animal she married.
  5. When eventually, I was released from custody, without any charges, I was informed by the authorities that any release of the passport I applied for, was conditional and subject to proof and actual observation of embarkation on a ship bound for some port from where the right connection to a railway station from where I was to carry on to London; and so it was. On arrival in London father benefited from a telephone call at work, the following day, from uncle Spyropoullos. He told father that he was in London at the time and added that I should call at the London Office in Covent Garden as he wished to know what happened when I went to collect my passport as I had been directed by the Security forces back in Cyprus. When I met with uncle Spyropoullos the next day he told me that he wished for me to get to know of the United Kingdom part and his European business activities. He also asked me to consider going to live with his family rather than face the problems of improper housing like the rest of my siblings. I was more than pleased to be offered the job and the opportunities that came with it, but I gratefully declined the offer to go live with his family, for, as I explained, I did not wish to benefit from any spoils while my brothers and sisters were facing such problems at the accommodation all were sharing living in tiny box rooms.
  6. Uncle asked me to seriously consider business / commercial studies and I told him that I wished to look at other, suitable to my interests and possibilities also, before I made my choice for a career. Eventually I decided to attend a course in Design, choosing Dress as the main course because of the influences I grew up with, care of mother’s activities back in Cyprus when struggling during the war years to raise her brood of five young ones. Parts of her industrious activities related to silk worm rearing / raising, spinning and weaving silk and other fabrics, by taking to Nicosia her personal loom and other ancillary equipment such as spinning wheels, etc. Throughout my four years of study at St Martin’s School of Art I supplemented my studies and training with paid for work in the clothing manufacturing industry / ready made wear in the West End of London. The aforesaid work experience brought me into contact with persons who benefited from and appreciated my contribution towards the better planning and management of their businesses. One, in fact, eventually offered me a partnership without any call for financial input from me.
  7. Within a year of my arrival in London, the Joannides family of seven secured a decent flat in Highbury and when father suffered from a bad case of pneumonia a district nurse would visit us daily at the flat in order to administer injections and other medication. Through a friendship that evolved between my two sisters and the nurse, when visiting the nurse at her residence in Wood Green when the nurse was getting married and my sisters were asked to stand as bridesmaids, a residential property in the same road as the engaged couple’s residential property, was to be sold. The property was partly occupied by sitting tenants, an elderly couple in occupation of the ground floor but the upper part was adequate for our family needs. When looking for the means to finance the acquisition of the property I got to know of the problems, the trappings and the one and only way the family could acquire the relevant property. At the time Local Authorities, such as the Wood Green Corporation, were providing funds for large families to acquire suitable accommodation through mortgage facilities at fixed low interest rates, and, as the facility was provided to family heads only, the issue was discussed and the only logical conclusion was for the property to be acquired in father’s name with the two working daughters to meet the initial deposit and the monthly mortgage repayment costs alternately, So it was agreed and the same arrangements were made also for the furniture and all other costs and expenses attached to the acquisition of such. All family members, relatives and friends were made privy to the agreed commitment of the two daughters Maria and Despina.
  8. Early on Maria exhibited her usual selfish mentality and indifference for any considerations towards any other. In the course of my final year at college we were made aware of a small workshop / making-up machining cut garments unit close to the hairdressing salon where Despina was employed. Maria, and myself visited the premises and it was agreed that it was a good opportunity to start with and father was informed accordingly. His input at the time was that we should proceed with the acquisition as a good business opportunity for Maria, implying that I was to be subject to her mentality towards others as the big boss she had been allowed to act as, care of the fraud of a father of five who had his wife slaving and toiling to raise the five children on her own without any input from him. Because of my observations while growing up and father’s inconsiderate approach to such important issues I qualified to father that I would do my best for Maria and assist her to manage, organise the work flow and the work force but I was not likely to accept and endure such mentalities as Maria adopted after the acquisition of the residential property. I suggested that it would be best for father and mother to acquire the business, so to speak, jointly as a family business and thereafter develop it as a family venture.
  9. I beg to divert to other developments while I was in my final year at college. At the time, following independence, Technical Education was high on the agenda of the Greek Communal Chamber in Cyprus and I was being offered a possible position, through a third party. The offers kept coming after I accepted the partnership business opportunity in London. At about the time when I informed father that I was to acquire a residential property in a suitable area befitting the business partnership and that the managing director of the main company my business partner and I were conducting business with, had given an excellent assurance and glowing references to the bank my partner and I were using to the effect that so long as I was involved in the business he would never look for any other making up unit, for he would rather see his business and the partnership business develop and expand side by side. When I informed father of my plans to move on, I also promised him that if Costas was to secure a place at any university for his intended studies in medicine, he could be assured for support from me as long as he was successful in his studies.
  10. At the time father asked of me to consider my obligations to my two sisters and in particular to Maria whose hand in marriage was being floated back in Cyprus care of some relatives who informed mother and father that a particular in-law of a relative who had visited his sister from Crete, had seen Maria’s photograph and expressed the wish to meet her and marry her. And so it was that I was caused to lay my plans to rest by the wayside, delay my intended own marriage to my choice of a wife, until such time as Maria was married, not in the distant future as it was presented to me. For the journey to Cyprus I joined a business associate of uncle Yiannis, and his wife, because they needed assistance for the drive through Europe to Athens, for neither spoke or understood any other language, besides Greek.
  11. When back in Cyprus I called at the Department of Technical Education of the Greek Communal Chamber and I had a good meeting with the head of the department. Some tine later uncle Yiannis informed me that he was very happy for me and congratulated me for the good news as reported in the newspapers. Apparently it was a case of an official announcement that I had been appointed to a new Technical School in Larnaca without any prior notification to me. In the meantime while in Cyprus for the main cause and reason as to why I had gone to Cyprus nothing from the offending abusers of my goodwill and trust, namely the fraud of a father and the envious Maria whose poor performance at elementary / junior school took us to the same exit door. Because of her poor performance she stayed put twice in the same school years, the 3rd and the 5th year classes. As it was I did not wish to offend the education authorities after the official announcement,
  12. While I was waiting and looking forward to the arrival of Maria no communications and or confirmation from Maria that she was to proceed with the cause and reasons why I had gone to Cyprus in the first instance at a very crucial point in my life as a person who always planned ahead in everything I was faced with in my long and varied journey through life, given the freedom of choice with the exception that in many an instance the maligned, the spiteful and the evil who abused and abuse the trust such persons seek and secure benefit from, such persons are rarely seen to reconsider their evil ways.
  13. Maria did, eventually, turn up in Cyprus after I had been caused to stay put and accept my fate as others arranged for me but mainly because I did not wish to embarrass the Education Authorities of the Greek Communal Chamber in Cyprus, for, in addition to all other principles my mother’s brother Savvas was a cantor at St John’s the church at the Archbishopric complex and the President, Archbishop Makarios, had known of my cousin Takis and me personally because of my uncle’s connection to the Archbishop. When, eventually, Maria arrived in Cyprus she did not even consider bringing any of my winter clothing bearing in mind that I had been caused to go to Cyprus in late Spring. She did, however, bring the tape recorder I wrote and asked for. She never spoke of or mentioned the reason why I was caused to go to Cyprus but she made sure she did not miss any opportunities to attend all shows and live performances from visiting recoding Greek artists, without considering the cost at the time when the scale of the salaries to be paid to Technical Education Teaching & Training staff / instructors had not been determined / concluded, due to long ongoing objections by the secondary / higher education school teaching staff.
  14. At the end of the first year, for the summer vacation, a number of English School old boys and teaching staff organised for a chartered flight to the United Kingdom and I was one of the participating contributors. I turned up unexpectedly in London and the reasons were soon put to the treacherous fraud of a father. My scooter which I used to travel to the West End during the early morning rush hour and my car had been sold. What was even more objectionable, disturbing and offensive to me was the fact that when I wrote to Costas in my hours of need after Maria returned to the United Kingdom, to call upon a good friend, Dick of Dickinson’s Photographic, in Piccadilly, he failed to do so himself. Instead he told father to collect the moneys I had paid as deposit for the Hi Fi equipment I was to buy for the intended acquisition of my personal home and residency, I was informed of the unacceptable manner in which father spoke and ‘demanded’ for the return of the moneys in the presence of clients at the time.
  15. It so happened in the course of my visit to London that a person who wished to ‘marry any suitable young lady in London’ and thereby secure unhindered residency in the United Kingdom; and, so, the usual arrangements were set in motion. In the course of dinner the suitor enquired who owned the Encyclopaedia Britannica in the lounge and Maria rushed to proclaim “the household”, thereby implying it was part of what was to be treated as hers, just as many other acquisitions were treated, as if hers and hers alone. I was left with no other choice but to respond appropriately by reminding her in the presence of all as to when and how I acquired the set; also why I had the volumes bound in claret wine Maroccan leather, and embossed with Gold leaf in capital Greek letters on the spine >Iota Omega<. I could have gone on to qualify further that the acquisition was paid for from the win on the pools I benefited from in father’s name because I started doing the pools long before I was 21. I could have added also that she wilfully failed to arrange for the payment of the cost of three pounds sterling (£3) towards the cost of the leather binding and the embossment with the Iota Omega on the spine in Gold leaf, towards the first and each of the next 20 annual updates / volumes for the subscription I contracted and paid for. I had no intention, however, to stir the waters at the time for obvious reasons. The aforesaid stated facts are but typical examples of Maria’s mentality towards other members of the Joannides Kingdom, as the clone product of the fraud of a husband and the fraud of a father of five.
  16. Moving on from the introduction to the clone products of the late Kyriacos Petrou Joannides Tsaroulla, I turn to the foundation stones on which the kingdoms of the Joannides, the Antoniades and the Englezakis principalities were created by such clone creators as Kyriacos Petrou Joannides. The very elements and principles directly relate and apply to the present day scenarios as created and concocted by the master abusers of trust and the crafty product-creations of the mother of all PSEUDO-democracies resting and founded, allegedly, on principles of Law and Order, such as the false instruments (alleged court orders proper) as I was to benefit from, a decade or so later; everything simply arranged and organised by the legal circles, with the blessings of the police and Ministers of the Crown, when I was the victim of such after I instigated legal proceedings in the High Court as covered in paragraphs 17 through to 23 hereinafter, related and covered most clearly, in plain English for even the most illiterate non-thinker to grasp and understand, lest the person be a simpleton / moron.
  17. Five years after returning to London in 1964, I found myself in a case of business misrepresentations and after conducting the essential research and securing the evidence called for, I contacted an old school friend from our common English School education and grounding. He, one Kypros Nichola, studied law and had set up his solicitors firm in Seven Sisters Road in the Finsbury Park area of North London close to the heartland of the Cypriot community, for obvious reasons. Given the facts and shown the documented evidence the solicitor organised a meeting with a barrister he recommended as ‘the man for the job’.
  18. Two years into the High Court action I benefited from a telephone call from the solicitor who asked me to attend his office after the staff had left at the end of the working day. He explained that he needed to speak to me, in private, about developments in the High Court Action. I attended as requested and while the solicitor was to seek the necessary file I went to the canteen to make a couple of coffees. I hardly passed on to the solicitor the coffee I made for him and as I put the one I made for me where I was to sit and he threw from across the table copy of a document the firm had received from the other party, the Defendants. I observed and noted more than enough without picking the document up and I simply asked for a copy which I needed to study carefully because he had qualified, as the legal authority, that on the evidence ‘that’ document represented I was bound to lose my case and, I should, therefore, abandon the claim; I should consider cutting my losses, he stipulated. Relying on our old school friendship I suggested that we could discuss the situation over souvla (charcoal grilled meat) in the garden at his residence which was not far from the Joannides family homestead.
  19.  Armed with the copy of the specific document, at the conclusion of the meeting, I called first at the police station not far from the solicitor’s offices. Thereafter I called at the police station in the same road where I carried on the business of young fashion-wear as ‘Take-off’ (to the moon, implied).  Both front desk police officers determined that as the issue I went to report was already in the courts I should simply let the solicitors and the courts deal with the case (do not bother the police, implied). In the circumstances, I contacted my Member of Parliament who arranged for me to meet with him at the surgery he was holding at an office at / in the Local Authority, the London Borough of Islington. At the conclusion of the meeting he suggested calling at the police station in Upper Street, Islington, where I should report my observations and concerns. On reporting my observations as directed by my MP I was advised to report my concerns to the police close to the High Court, in Holborn, because the report / complaint related to an active High Court action. And, Holborn police instructed me to report my observations and concerns to the Headquarters of the Metropolitan Police not far from the Victoria mainline railway station. In the circumstance I caused to be delivered by post to Sir Robert Mark the acting Metropolitan Police Commissioner my observations, complaints and concerns, founded and resting on the creation of the false instrument years after the events it was allegedly referring / related to, for it was endorsed with the wrong year, the year when the High Court Writ of Summons was issued, whereas the year of the events that gave rise to the cause and reasons for legal action took place the previous year. (Refer to Page 1 of the Exhibit “A.Y.1” attached to this my affidavit). In so far as I have ever been concerned only the mentally, the morally and the ethically blind could be excused for failing to observe and note the amended digits from 70 to 69.
  20. Following my personal visits at the two local police stations, armed as I had been with the copy of the offensive to me document, I telephoned my solicitor the following morning and cancelled the suggested weekend meeting over souvla. Due to the fact that my solicitor had told me that he had received the questionable document from the Defendant’s solicitors, after the additional activities I engaged in failed to produce any interest by the authorities, I telephoned my solicitor, weeks later, and I simply asked of him to arrange for inspection of documents without mentioning my observations, my visits to the local police or the rest of my actions. I explained that until the physical inspection I could not be expected to act as Mr Kypros Nichola, my old school friend and solicitor directed me. Hence the reasons why he acceded to my request and he arranged for a member of his staff to deal with and organise the inspection of documents as a priority issue.
  21. I asked Harry Savva Dumbar, a trainee barrister who was operating out of my solicitor’s offices, at the time, as I was informed by my solicitor, to inform me of the inspection date and eagerly I looked forward to that event. On the way to the Defendant’s solicitors, Mr Dunbar told me that my presence was most ‘irregular. After the physical inspection of the documents, specifically the offending creation I asked Mr Dunbar IF HE NOTICED THE OBVIOUS, namely the fact that the relevant document had benefited from a little accident and he asked me to explain “why the question”. I qualified that I noted as of the moment Mr Nichola threw, from across the table, the document that turned the case around, that the very document had been endorsed with the wrong year and the error had been ‘corrected’, hence the requested / demand for the physical inspection of the original which as it happened, was a spirtograph copy-form, a document, apparently created and used by the buyers of the company that placed the order with the Defendants. I then qualified and I asked Mr Dumbar to look up the documented evidence I passed on to my solicitor in the first instance. I qualified and stipulated that he should consider the simple fact that I had written to the Defendants >at the time of the events<, and requested for a copy of the letter which the Defendants were to write to the buyers to the effect that the garments were not to be delivered. In other words the contract was to be cancelled by the sellers, the defendants. And, I emphasised the fact that the buyers (not the sellers / Defendants) had written back to me and stated that the order had been cancelled before I was faced with the fraudulent in intent misrepresentations. I pointed out that the letter / reply I received from the buyers discredited the assertions from the Defendant’s director and the issue of who cancelled the order qualified my rightful claim against the Defendants. Such a letter, as the Defendant’s Director spoke of was not sent to the Buyers Department at C&A, I added and I pointed out that before I had the initial meeting with Mr Nicholas and the follow-up meeting with the recommended Barrister / Counsel I had secured a letter from the C&A Buyers Department who wrote back to state that the particular order (garments) had been canceled by the buyers before I was even asked to cut and make up the particular style.
  22. Following the above I benefited from information that the Defendants applied to the court seeking an order from the court “to dismiss the action on “Want of prosecution grounds”. My reaction was very clear “Should the Defendant’s application succeed Nicholas & Co would be held liable for the damages suffered by me and the use of the false and forged too, instrument would be high on the agenda. At and for the relevant hearing I had requested of Sir Robert Mark’s office to arrange for a qualified police officer to attend the hearing but my request was ignored and cast aside, in typical Metropolitan police indifference to criminal activities by and from within the legal circles and the courts, as my research and study of such practices as I had been subjected to, established.
  23. On the day of the particular hearing, without disclosing my intentions to attend, after securing the relevant information (enquiries of and at the High Court) I waited in the corridor some distance and round the corner for the respective legal teams to enter the Master’s chambers and a few minutes later I knocked on the door and simply entered the room; the Master told me that it was a private hearing and I proceeded to inform the Master that I was the Plaintiff, the first person entitled to address the court. My solicitor and his team confirmed my statement and stance, so I was invited to take a seat. The Defendant’s application was dismissed and directions were given for the case to be transferred to the Mayor’s and City of London Court leading to yet more research and study by and for me, Master Waldman having imposed cost damages on the Plaintiff (ME) as organised and arranged by my recklessly abusive of my trust old school friend Kypros Nichola, my solicitor who obviously had been working hand in glove with the Defendants legal team, as a typical licensed by the Law Society solicitor. So were, also, the costs warranted for the appeal which the Defendants legal team engaged in, following the Master’s order & Directions. That event (the appeal) was also conducted behind closed doors, as I got to know of and was to experience during the event, because a nephew of mine who expressed interest in the case and my brother Costas were not allowed to enter the court room. The usher even tried to block and stop me entering the court room, as happened earlier when I attended the hearing by / before Master Waldman, I simply informed the usher that I happened to be, ‘the plaintiff’ which took us to the scenario when I walked into the Master’s chambers, earlier. Of such activities the promotions about “JUSTICE SEEN TO BE DONE”. The day’s result? Case struck out, leading to the need for MORE scenarios and theatrical productions with the attached revenue creation for the actors, both legal teams and in the instance at hand to hell with Parliament’s FORGERY ACT of 1913 and all other Acts of Parliament relative to the need and purpose of many other Acts of Parliament as for instance for and in respect of provisions for “MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE”, to mention another relevant Act of Parliament most breached and violated by judicial chair occupants.
  24. The above stated facts and realisations created and caused health problems care of a severe stomach ulcer condition which did lead to the need for surgery, as I was advised by my doctor and the Hospital team addressing the state of my health. When in hospital for the planned operation at the Middlesex Hospital in Central London, I thought of visiting my father’s cousin Dr. K Kamaris at his surgery in Harley Street. I got dressed and told the staff nurse and ward sister that I wished to go to a book shop and look for something I could read during the recovery days after the operation. Dr Kamaris advised me not to undergo the specific surgery because part of it entailed some change to the exit valve / muscle from the stomach to the intestines and as a consequence the acids from the stomach when mixed with the alkali created gas and bloated bellies thereby causing the unpleasant sounds getting rid of the excessive wind. I was also told that the over-acidity and ulcer condition could be dealt with care of a diet that could reduce the over-acidity in combination with specific medication.
  25. Following Dr Kamaris advice I discussed what I was told with the surgeon and the medical team at the Middlesex hospital, who ‘confirmed the wind scenario’ and it was agreed that I should try my father’s cousin advice. Shortly afterwards I was introduced to the person I married later; she was a refugee from Cyprus and the introduction stirred my concerns and interests that caused more than half of the island’s population to be displaced. The person after getting to know of the ulcer condition exhibited interest and concerns and after getting to know of her family’s connection with my cousin Xanthos as more than neighbours, in Famagusta back in Cyprus, I decided to ask her if she would consider a permanent relationship and marriage to a man who was about 10 years older than her. And so it was that the friendship progressed to an engagement that eventually lead to a wedding in Cyprus after explaining why we should not commit ourselves to the states imposed by politicians and alleged legal commitments by and from unprincipled persons such as the abusers of the courts facilities who destroyed my businesses and my health, qualifying at the time why we should marry as Orthodox Christian Hellenes and raise our children as such too. And so it was, after explaining also that I did not wish to have any of the Joannides immediate family, except mother and my younger sister Despina attend our wedding with her young daughters as possible brides-maids if she did not mind. The aforesaid by way of realities stated / disclosed founded on experiences resting on the criminal in intent impositions by abusers of public office in contempt of Parliament’s LAWS.
  26. Moving on in time, Costas the brother who had been assigned the simple task to collect funds needed to attend to my endowment policy, when I got stuck in Cyprus, he got married to a young woman, who, to all intents and purposes was learning hairdressing as one of the many our sister Despina had tutored over the years. For the occasion of that commitment Costas went into business with Maria and her husband. For that business the couple were to acquire a long leasehold combined business premises with residential accommodation above, in East London, Leytonstone. In order to raise the funds needed Maria, we were told by father, that she was demanding for her share of the residential property at Woodside Road, Wood Green, after she and her husband instructed agents to call at and value the Joannides family homestead. Despina told father, and she told me too that she would try and raise the funds for Maria’s half. Despina who had her hairdressing business account with Lloyds Bank at the same branch as me after a meeting with the bank manager, which I attended also, the manager assured Despina that for the specific purposes the loan facility Despina sough and applied for there arose no problems and so we informed father. His response was that there was no need for such because he had already sorted it all out, by attending to the problem. Months later we got to know ‘how father attended to the problem’ and it was obvious that on the one hand he did not wish to be further offended by Maria’s mentality and demands; on the other hand he did not wish for Despina’s husband to engage in similar impositions and demands, for he had been speaking of such failures as ‘his wife and he, not benefiting from his wife’s share, whereas Maria and her husband were actually in occupation and had been living in and benefiting from much more from Maria’s share, for years’.
  27. Following the suicide of the second child of my younger sister Despina, born of her care of her marriage to Sotiris Neophytou Englezakis many the revelations Despina never spoke of (at least to me) especially after I was asked to assist and help Despina who determined to divorce the man who had caused their daughter, along with other members of the Englezakis clan to take her own life. In the course of the repairs, renovations and the extensive restructuring works I undertook and committed myself to, Despina gradually revealed to me many facets of the character of the man she had married, especially after her husband was noted and had been seen to be acting as if a stone age male who set out to engage in all manner of such impositions as the male who had assumed and he had been exercising absolute authority and control of everything and everyone, including his wife, Despina who was way down his list of priorities as a working wife who had been in business with her own hairdressing salon long before she married him. Despina first spoke of life with ‘the male stone-age chauvinist’, only after Sotiris Englezakis attempted to impose his long established ways by commanding of Despina to bank in the couple’s joint account (under his control from inception) the income she was to receive from the first tenants, the Wijemuni-Congalves couple. I beg to refer to the 8-pages long letter / document of submissions-reminders to the solicitor who was instructed by Despina to proceed with the divorce she instigated proceedings for, with instructions to address and deal accordingly with the essential matrimonial assets distribution. (Refer to Pages 2 through to 9, of the Exhibit “A.Y.1” attached to this my affidavit).
  28. l hasten to add that the very solicitor, Pany Symeou happened to have been the person whom Rita Englezakis (the second daughter of the Sotiris and Despina Englezakis couple) had chosen to be her life partner and announced to family members, starting with her parents that she and Pany Symeou had committed themselves to one another by getting engaged. In the circumstances it was expected of the solicitor Pany Symeou, who had himself experienced the recklessly indifferent and irresponsible Sotiris Englezakis’ approach to any other’s choices and preferences, to act and operate as the solicitor who was duty bound to concern himself with the rights of his client and the instructions he had benefited from. When giving instructions to the solicitor Pany Symeou evidence was included relative to the existence of the loan facility-account in the sum of over one and a half million of UK Sterling pounds (£1,500,000+) earning 10%pa. The said loan facility from the Sotiris and Despina Englezakis couple, to the Englezakis Brothers and Sisters family businesses, which reality I was left with no other option but to publish the existing documented evidence, in the public domain following the failures of her husband to come to terms with the results of his mentality towards his wife and their children’s needs and personal choices , specifically after Rita had made the fatal decision to end it all by taking her own life.
  29. The above stated publication after Despina furnished and provided me with the evidence attached to the relevant interest earning account as her instructions to the solicitor Pany Symeou had been. The publication of the specific evidence, on the internet, was removed by me, however, after I benefited from a telephone call that Sotiris (Despina’s husband) had placed a contract on my life, by visiting one of the many dingy cafe-gambling clubs in Green Lanes, in the ‘Haringey Ladder’ area. I hasten to add that publication of the interest earning funds in the public domain was commanded of me, especially so, because the solicitor Pany Symeou who was operating out of Graham White, the solicitor firm firm he moved to, submitted to my sister Despina a highly questionable document which my sister was directed to sign. Owing to the fact that my sister had been kept in the dark, and she was not given any information by Sotiris Englezakis, I simply pointed out that if she was not made aware of and privy to her husband’s (Sotiris Englezakis) ‘personal and private arrangements’ as he referred to and spoke of such for decades, the need arose to challenge the document Despina, my sister, received, as covered and pointed out to the solicitor Pany Symeou, because the document was connecting and committing her to whatever her husband had been and was engaging / engaged in. The need to challenge the request for Despina to sign a document of questionable objectives and legal commitment had been established when / after her husband Sotiris Englezakis, declined and adamantly refused to furnish the name of the accountant who was dealing with the couple’s obligations for tax returns; the afore stated request when the third of the five units was completed and ready for occupation by tenants. The adamant refusal and the addition of the 10% interest on the previous year’s assets warranting attention by the solicitor who was representing my sister Despina in the divorce case did lead to a telephone call I merited from a person who did not wish to part with his name or furnish me with additional information. In the circumstances it made no difference to me whether the call was in respect of a genuine scenario, IF in the alternative Sotiris, himself instigated the specific telephone call.
  30. Following the telephone call, I was left with no other option but to remove from the public domain (from the Internet) the specific publication of and about the interest earning loan facility, which I was informed by the telephone caller caused Sotiris Englezakis to attend an undisclosed ‘dingy café’ in Green Lanes, Haringey, London N4, frequented by many a shady character in order to put to the persons who were frequenting the place “a contract on my life”. The fact that Sotiris was and had ultimately been seen to be responsible for Rita, to take her own life under the tragic circumstances she elected to end it all, coupled to Sotiris’ failures to reconsider his failings (as a husband and as a father) also his relentless parts in the creation of the never-ending states Despina and myself were subjected to as the abandoned to the wolves / to the criminals in control of the law Enforcement Agencies and to other Public Services (the police, the legal circles and the courts) such as I first experienced in 1972-1976 after I instigated High Court proceedings (refer to paragraphs 17 to 23) founded and resting on commercial / business fraud, sufficed for me to consider the fact that I had undertaken to stand by my sister in addition to the reality that as a father of two young children I should consider what I set out to do and achieve, bearing in mind that despite all I had been subjected to by the organisers who re-arranged my life through use of the feminasty gestation vessel and abuse of the facilities at the disposal of abusers of judicial office in the lower >COUNTY COURTS<, I had secured strong and sufficient evidence through which to proceed to proper representation to Ministers and publication of such submissions and representations-challenges in the public domain by relying on the principle that Justice should and MUST BE SEEN TO BE DONE, hence the reference to the use of the very principle when I determined that it was called for and commanded of me to use the Internet facility when the letting management team and the letting agent of the Stavros Antonas property was seen to have been party to the denial of funds owing to the property occupied by a family of the imported >AS ARRANGED< refugees / asylum seekers. I refer to a family of four who came to the United Kingdom instead of going to France as ex French colony products who could not speak or understand English.
  31. I refer above to the family who declared no knowledge of the three false letters typed in upper case English; all three letters carrying the very same photocopied signature of the property owner who, also denied knowledge of the three letters with the COPIED COMMON SIGNATURE as presented, as promoted and as used by the staff and officers of Haringey Council; also the Letting Agency officer  and Gurbux Singh,  the Chief Executive Officer used as retained by Haringey Council. The last, after writing to confirm himself that the tenants knew not of the three letters which Haringey Council staff and officers introduced in the ORCHESTRATED ARRANGEMENTS (between the Letting Agency and the staff and officers of Haringey Council who were acting as intermediaries / handlers of the Social Security funds) in and OR THE THEFT & MISAPPROPRIATION OF THE HOUSING BENEFIT FUNDS with the blessings of Haringey Police and the abusers of judicial chair beneficiaries who were seen to be free to engage and indulge in blunt arrogant criminal activities such as the attempt to enjoin / amalgamate the two County Court actions when the attempt was definitely intended to be used for arrogant fraud on the owner of the targeted properties, my sister. Everything care of the use and issue / creation of the fraudulent in intent issue of a Legal Aid Certificate, whereby and through which facility, the legal costs funds recoverable through court orders issued by the court addressing properly the issues before it.  (Refer to paragraph 18 on page 6 of the 8 pages long document constituting page 7 of the exhibit  “A.Y.1” attached to this my affidavit).
  32. The Legal Aid Certificate I allude to above, apparently ‘granted’ for the institution of an alleged claim founded on a concocted illegal dispossession of the created and used fraudsters (the Wijemuni-Congalves couple) who engaged in the moonlight flight in broad daylight as covered in paragraph 6(f) and 6(g) on page 4 of the 8 pages long letter to the solicitor Pany Symeou. (Refer to page 4 of the 8 pages long letter constituting page 5 of the exhibit “A.Y.1” attached to this my affidavit). The alleged illegal eviction, dispossession within three three days of the created, used and relied upon fraudsters who were served who were being used to generate lega;l proceedings and theatrical productions in the abused courts such as I was first faced with as the targeted victim of abusers of of the High Court facilities covered in paragraphs 17 to 23 above I relate.
  33. Needless to repeat, yet again,  everything was instigated and being created by the boastful husband of Despina my younger sister who engaged and indulged in highly questionable, behind the scenes activities including the assault I was subjected to after I challenged and reported the orchestrated water damages alleged o have been caused from above the hairdressing salon at 178 Weston Park, Hornsey, London N8. Reference to the assault I was the victim of, because I challenged the the obvious attempt to create and generate a fraudulent insurance claim; the assault very assault commanding the need to to instigate a private prosecution at the local Magistrates court following reckless indifference and blunt contempt for for the evidence by Haringey police, as the police established following many subsequent criminal acts Sotiris Englezakis engaged in, of his own and with others, such as the husband of and the woman who had been granted a lease of Despina’s haidressing salon business after Despina Englezakis had undergone mastectomy operations followed by extensive Radiotherapy, for and because of life threatening cancer.
  34. Also, after I had been caused to publish the documented evidence relative to the annual interest earned charges that were being added to the loan arrangements Sotiris Englezakis organised with and for the Englezakis Bros and Sisters businesses, when I was left with no option but remove from the internet the evidence attached to to the assets of the Sotiris and Despina Englezakis couple. The need did arise, by then, to emphasise the fact that the deep pockets boastful Sotiris Englezakis had established much more than I was looking to and expecting from the Metropolitan Police who failed to initially to prosecute Mr Englezakis who attempted to strangle me, in the presence of witnesses who were in the hairdressing salon at the time of the orchestrated water-flood from upstairs; the assault at the point when I pointed out that I had and I was going to secure additional photographic evidence attached to the concocted water flood from above the first floor front room only.
  35. In the circumstances I was obliged to create records of briefly stated facts attached to the developments following Despina’s instructions to the solicitor Pany Symeou, with due reference to the activities and the boasting of and from Sotiris Englezakis, the man with the deep pockets who was seen to have been benefiting from the black economy and the invisible services on tap. I refer to the developments that followed, as covered, as covered in the 8-pages long letter of challenges-submissions, dated 3oth March 2016, to the solicitor Pany Symeou which I determined ought to be put on record and in the public domain, when commanded of me, because of additional wrongdoing such as ore reckless failings by Haringey police  to prosecute Sotiris Englezakis, after he attempted to strangle me (following my challenges and the report to the Insurance Broker).
  36. The aforesaid realities simply added to the need to put on notice the criminals who were seen and noted to have been relying on the orchestrated abuse of public facilities for the imposition of such states as I had been invited to look into and assist other victims of the orchestrated Housing Benefit scenarios after Sotiris Englezakis was seen to have extended his demand and expectations in respect of the rent income Despina was to benefit from, following the renovations and improvements to the first floor rooms of the residential property at 68 Rathcoole Gardens, Hornsey, London N8 building. I refer to the Wijemouni-Congalves couple who were noted and seen to have been co-operating, later in and for the constructively orchestrated, alleged, Housing Benefit, as actually was seen to have been the scenario in the Stavros Antonas, residential property case when an Appeal was called for after an abuser of trust >the agent who was instructed to issue a Default Summons for and in respect of the unpaid rents< (the Housing Benefit not paid to the agent who asserted that the Default Summons had been dealt by the court and was dismissed). The promotions by the very  agent >person< who was seen to have benefited from the participation of and from the promotion of the alleged judicious person, as covered in the explicit appeal which I published in the public domain. >The common factor for the issue of BOTH Default Summonses, simply the UNPAID & NOT ACCOUNTED FOR Housing Benefit!!! >The contracted rents that never reached / were not remitted to the property owners<. In the Wijemuni-Congalves couple case, were the first tenants to have been accepted by my sister Despina, contracted with her with my care of my assistance and guidance, took possession of the first floor rooms at 68 Rathcoole Gardens, in Hornsey, London N8, (>one of the two properties held in joint names by the Englezakis couple<). The element of the divorce was a matter for the solicitor Pany Symeou and the rest of the approved and licensed by Law Society >with the Law Society itself (or someone from within the institution, party to the theft of the funds debited >STOLEN< from the bank account of the person who was meant / alleged to have been benefiting from the concocted HOUSING BENEFIT, for which no proof or evidence was ever producedby the tenants, the Haringey Council team who allegedly was for months not able to process the alleged application, among the other CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES, the very teal of alleged servants of the public engaged and indulged in!!! The very scenarios also concocted and promoted for and in respect of the UNPAID RENTS conveniently through the Housing Benefit facilities as rooted / administered / distributed by the criminals in control of an allegedly civilised Pseudo-Democracy, one that allegedly is founded and rests on the administration & application of THE LAW created by THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ELECTORATE, of the SHEEPle who are abandoned to the wolves scavenging and feasting on the sucker-serfs who have taxes imposed on them for the retainers and the maintenance of seasoned criminals and abusers of public office.

THE ABOVE SUFFICE FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SERVING NOTICE ON THE ABUSERS OF THE COURTS FACILITIES AND THE PERSONS THEY HAVE BEEN USING AND RELYING UPON TO IMPOSE the usual / established manifestations through contempt of the realities and the applicable evidence covered in documents which the abusers of the courts facilities and users of the misguided and the used for fraud aplenty and conversion of assets to allegedly legitimate charges for legal costs as attached to the type of the alleged legitimate court proceedings covered in the case Yiannides –v- Radley Gowns. (1970-1976).

NOTE, by way of extension and introduction to the second part of my FAMily of man AFFidavit I add to the above, the following elements and issues as warranted and called for when the abusers of the public and specifically the courts facilities indulged and engaged in the allegedly legitimate bankruptcy of my sister Mrs. Despina Englezakis who conveniently / miraculously did not benefit from the divorce she sought and instructed Mr. Pany Symeou, the first of the solicitors who were / are licensed by the Law Society of England and Wales to practice LAW within the beehives of corruption referred to as courts of law in the United Kingdom.

In the mater of the alleged insolvency of Mrs. Despina Englezakis, the abuser of the USED PUBLIC FACILITIES one Christopher Charles Garwood, operating as an approved and licensed by the Law Society, by the State and the Courts as an allegedly Honourable Officer of the Court, the very person when pointed to his duties and obligations >>>First to ensure that all moneys  owing to the allegedly insolvent person are recovered (and assets ARE accounted for, NOTE SUCKER-SERFS) and claimed<<< from all persons liable, in which case it so happened that the Law Society itself was and is such an entity (>accountable debtor<) because it was / had been helping itself to funds from the allegedly insolvent person’s, Mrs. Englezakis ‘ bank account for years.  For and of such activities the documented evidence relate to theft of funds without cause or justifiable reasons / cause for OR SERVICE OF & FOR the benefit and the instructions the sucker-serf Mrs Despina Englezakis, my younger sister.

As a typical licensed by the Law Society, the arrogant Christopher Charles Garwood of Wilkin Chapman LL, of P O Box 16, Town Hall Square, Grimsby, N E Lincolnshire, DN31  1HE, simply elected to ignore such matters and cast aside his duties and obligations as an alleged ‘Trustee’  who buried such issues and the documented evidence in the dark corners of his criminal in essence, mindset. In other words just  a typical solicitor-product of the Law Society, the members of which operate as independent of Parliament’s Laws restraints, such as one might find in the most backward of uncivilized states / countries, whatever.

I beg to draw attention to a true print of the material facts related in the stated facts attached to the criminal in intent activities the staff and officers of Haringey Council were and have been engaging in, while alleged officers of the lower courts, namely, in the instance at hand, Edmonton County Court, simply ignored such activities and through defaults in the execution of their public duties, just like the police ignored and thereby endorsed the criminal activities covered and related in the public domain, on the Internet, as of the relevant failures by one and all to address the criminal activities such as covered in the exposed realities which not one public servant and / or the media ever concerned themselves with, as of the days when I was going through the motions,the pains and agonies the ulcer condition health-wise imposed on me care of the criminals in control of the courts and the police as maintained by the elected representatives of alternating political parties, NOT OF THE THE SUCKER-SERFS who have taxes imposed on them for the maintenance of such states as in the present scenarios I cover and point to, for the umpteenth time, but as representatives of political parties each party / person committed to pre-scripted and ordained by the master-controllers of all and everything.                   


Mr Andrew Yiannides

THE TARGETED VICTIM of the criminals in control of the COURTS & THE POLICE >the law administration bodies as maintained by the United Kingdom, can be contacted by email to Or mobile (0044, UK) 07449592353

27th April 2018

Before me …………………………..…………… Officer Authorized to take Affidavits



Be Sociable, Share!


  • Just introduced the latest of submissions-invitations to all victims of the abused courts FACILITIES (as I have been pointing out for over four decades). The realities deposed of / COVERED ON AFFIDAVIT and the evidence pointed to AS PUBLISHED IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN were meant and intended for persons who can and DO USE GREY MATTER > the human brain each was gifted with >IF A TRUE HUMAN< , one who CAN USE what nature and his or her education sharpened and thereby created a THINKER out of nature's gift. PERIOD. Enough is enough; true humans should first learn to THINK for themselves and thereafter consider OTHERS and what others have gone through. Hence the main element and issue to be addressed by the first 50 who join > >THE PROJECT< . THE PROJECT planned over 20 years ago, SIMPLY to challenge appropriately the offending abusers of trust and >THROUGH THE ABUSED COURTS >WITH INTENT< and thus seen to be USING THE VERY FACILITIES I WAS THE VICTIM OF with criminal intent and for personal undisclosed reasons, as covered by me in the document > DEMAND REFORM & INDICTMENTS MR & MRS AVERAGE who have had enough of and about the taxes being imposed on them for the retainers and the maintenance of criminals in public office, such as the criminals who imposed on me and the two innocent children I was responsible for, after I MARRIED THE PARASITIC FRAUD OF AN ALLEGED HUMAN (just an ANIMAL who enjoyed the benefits of the marriage to 'the idiot' who married her out of compassion under the circumstances her path crossed his (mine) when some public servant determined she was not welcome in the United Kingdom, even though a refugee from Cyprus (the ex British Colony where both of us were born. The unwelcome REFUGEE from the island, after Turkey invaded the island with long existing plans for the islanders.... but that was and is another matter. What was and remains most relevant happens to be the issue of the plight of REFUGEES, for the policy / the plans for such persons have changed. As a typical EVE of an animal the GESTATION VESSEL. The EVE was simply used by the criminals in control who collectively established and imposed their EVIL WAYS of the EVE, just a true product creation of the animal who gave birth to her and raised her as just a typical EVE of an alleged human. WAKE UP DREAMERS WHO ABUSED MY GOODWILL, my valuable TIME and GENEROSITY OVER THE PAST 46 years while I was simply studying the performance of each LOUSY ACTOR who was sent along or of his / her own (as a stooge) or of his or her own adopted such VILE ROLES AS EACH was used for OR CAME ALONG WITH and ENACTED such vile scripts as each was and remained of opinion that I WAS JUST ANOTHER MONKEY who was not able to peel open the banana each handed to me...... (the scenarios each spoke of without pointing to / bringing along ANY EVIDENCE, IN SUPPORT OF EACH ONE's promotions. The petition MOST CLEAR and the evidence pointed to even clearer, in so far as the British Justice System is operated and USED FOR by the licensed criminals created >FOR sucking >dismissal over two and a half centuries ago. GOOD MORNING, WAKE UP SUCKER-SERFS >criminals are in control for centuries and have been planning / directing YOUR LIVES. WAKE UP.

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>