VISITOR-READER, please note that the below, as published here was not posted to the Prime Minister of the day because of the upheaval in the ruling >polytical< party of the day. Poly— incidentally relates to the multifaceted points of view in any elected representatives of the SHEEPle, parliament PSEUDO-Democracy.

20th November 2016


In June 2015, Michael Gove on taking Office, appointed Justice Secretary / Lord Chancellor addresses the issue and speaks of:- “BRITISH JUSTICE IN THE DOCK“, reported yet ignored by the media as of the days when I first reported criminal activities in the Royal Courts of Justice!!!


In July 2016, Elizabeth Truss appointed Justice Secretary / Lord Chancellor. The MP for South West Norfolk since her election in 2010 has also served as the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs under David Cameron’s administration since 2014. Before entering politics, Ms. Truss worked in energy and telecoms, as an economist and as the Deputy Director for the think-tank Reform:- “lt’s a privilege and an honour for me to have been sworn in today as the first woman Lord Chancellor…, the duties that go with this role today…, to respect and defend the Rule of Law and the independence of the judiciary (>from the restraints of Parliament’s LAW???)- ‘must be upheld’ now as ever!!!!!!!!!!!! In my time as Lord Chancellor, I will uphold them with dedication because the rule of Law is the cornerstone of the British way of life. NOTE, we add:- >And the most abused, most promoted and most guarded / protected privilege which the rest of the public servants rush to proclaim when operating as accessories and abettors of the ORCHESTRATED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD ON THE TAX-BURDENED CITIZENS who are abandoned to the system that corrupts, eventually, the victims who somehow succeed when appealing all the way to >return to this link and get to know of the realities, reader, researcher and concerned sucker-serf / victims of PSEUDO-Democracies!!!!!!!!!!!!



1.  As an industrious creative business proprietor, in October 1969, I was faced with an arrogant state of FRAUDULENT IN CONCEPT & IMPOSITIONS scenario that commanded of me the need to seek Justice, through the Legal System / the High Court.

2. For the occasion I contacted and furnished full particulars and the essential, documented evidence which I secured before I called upon an old high school friend who followed the legal profession, armed, as I was, with the essential evidence in support of the case, my case >MY SUBSTANTIVE CLAIM<.

3.  Following a meeting and the essential briefing with a Barrister the legal wheels were set in motion and the process was left with >the professionals< to address and secure the warranted end product’, as I anticipated and expected of ‘the experts’.

4,  Two years into the case I benefited from a telephone call, whereby my solicitor invited me to visit him after the staff had gone, because it was important that he spoke to me in private, he explained.

5.  The reason for the privacy related to ‘the advice’ I was to benefit from, which, >according to my old school friend<, was to be my reaction to abandon the claim / case and cut my losses short, for my claim was bound to fail (!!!), >because of the strength of the evidence my solicitor received from the Defendant’s solicitors<.

6.  The above ‘advice from the professional’, was supported with the passing (>throwing<) over to the other side of the table, where I was about to sit, a copy document, right side up. I saw more than enough on first glance while standing up and, without picking the document up, I simply asked for a copy of the particular document, adding that we should discuss the developments, as old friends (???), over ‘souvla’ (>charcoal grilled meat<) during the weekend at his residence, which was not far from mine.

7. The specific document, when created, had been endorsed with the year (19)70, the year when the Writ of Summons was issued and served, and the digits 70 were altered (the 7 to 6 and the 0 to 9, (19)69 being the year of the fraudulent misrepresentations, I had been subjected to.

8. The offending document-creation, as advanced and promoted, by the legal circles, / the professionals, clearly was intended to be used for the generation of fraudulent in concept income >for and by the professionals<, the legal circles, while frustrating the targeted, the intended victim who had no option but to instigate legal proceedings, >while a misguided believer< in the justice system, as maintained for and used by the professionals.

9.  The document (>alleged evidence<) advanced by the Defendant’s solicitors and as promoted and used by >both professional legal teams<, in the course of subsequent court developments, established without room for any doubt that >the blessings of judicial capacity officers< were and have been ever present, care of the Police who were >seen to be operating as a wholesome body-corporate partner< in the criminal activities ongoing in and through the courts, over the last 44 plus years. (>Since I set out to look into and study / engage in the warranted research<).

10.  True copy of the created false and forged defense document, was received and seen by many an Intellectual Prostitute acting for and operating as reporters out of the mainline newspapers and the media generally, starting with my daily readThe Manchester Guardian’, as it was known then. The editor simply passed the extensive documented evidence on, to a professor of law at the London School of Economics who contacted me directly (>telephone call<). Both, however, were not prepared to commit themselves to >raising public awareness< to the liberties and the >criminal, in essence, activities< ongoing through abuse of the courts >facilities<, within the Royal Courts of Justice.

11.  Image of the false and forged creation, as used in the High Court theatrical scenarios that were enacted by the participants before judicial chair occupants, including two Lord Justices at the Court of Appeal, was and has remained published in the public domain; true copies were seen and handed to many an otherwise motivated false fronts presenters who care not about any other, even their own / same family members, such as the family the victim came from and was raised as the eldest son of a fantastic and a very considerate mother.

12.  The image of the offending document-creation can be accessed at:- and the scenarios as planned, enacted and executed by the offending abusers of the courts processes are covered in paragraphs 17 to 25 of pages 11 to 17 of the FACTS STATED in the document referenced >1PFamAff< intended for release in the public domain, as  part of the proposed and demanded indictment which the police and the government of the days, ought to have duly considered at the actual time of the events; even more so NOW, when one considers the development of the state of the health of the victims of many a product-creations of the justice AND POLICING system as maintained by successive governments of >alternating political ideologies but nonetheless of similar disposition to the ‘alleged’ welfare of Mr. & Mrs. Average, who have >taxes imposed on them for such services as the police<, meant and intended to ensure that breaches of Parliament’s Laws are duly prosecuted and judges whose primary function is to apply their grasp of the law to established and >proven cases of breaches of THE LAW<, as happened to have been the promotion of the >false and forged< creation of a document that was used by ‘the professionals’ in support of a concocted defense, >three years (>1969<) after the events< that gave rise to the institution of High Court action the following year >1970<, YIANNIDES -v- RADLEY GOWNS (1970, Chancery Division).


Andrew Yiannides

ENCLOSED/ATTACHED: Copies of my communications as referred to in the context of my letter of 20th November 2016 to the International League (>ILFHR-UN<) as the occasion commanded of me, for indeed in the circumstances, you need to be properly informed and acquainted with the states imposed on my younger sister, Mrs. Despina Englezakis and on me through arrogant abuse of the courts facilities by abusers of public office as orchestrated by seasoned criminals operating out of Local Government / Local Authorities, namely Haringey Council.



and DAMAGES to your property

in London – HARINGEY

because you rented your home / house / property to tenants

through Letting Agencies and you were faced with problems


and or other excuses you were offered by the agents

YOU SHOULD CONTACT the member of

The Landlords Action Group

Mr Stavros Antona

on 252-3239 or 252-5034

(Ayia Varvara – Nicosia)



στην περιουσία σας στο ΛονδίνοHARINGEY

επειδή ενοικιάσατε το σπίτι / την περιουσία σας

σε ενοικιαστές μέσω μεσήτες και ήχατε προβλήματα

που σας πρόσφεραν οι μεσήτες


με το μέλος του Landlords Action Group

κύριον Στάυρο Αντώνα

(Αγία Βαρβάρα – Λευκωσία)

The above NOTICE / ANNOUNCEMENT was called for in 1997 when looking into and studying the activities of the handlers of Housing Benefit / Social Security funds distributed by and through abusers of public office and public facilities, while relying on the police to ignore ORGANISED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES as arranged and orchestrated by Local Government & Local County Courts. Any party / persons interested, all concerned taxed / Revenue providers should access the material facts covered and the evidence pointed to at and benefit from THE EVIDENCE PUBLISHED IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AS OF THE TIME OF THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES ONGOING THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COUNTY COURTS WITH THE BLESSINGS OF THE POLICE & PERSONS ACTING / OPERATING AS ALLEGED JUDICIOUS PERSONS >Judges<, who systematically act in contempt of Parliament’s Law care of the principle of the independence judges are assured of >ONLY< WHEN SEEN TO BE ACTING & OPERATING within the rules of procedure and the RULE OF LAW AS CREATED BY PARLIAMENT and as provided / resting and founded on ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE and the rules of procedure within the courts.

From Andrew Yiannides created 1st August 2016.


The heavy strike sustained injuries intended to silence or eliminate the challenger. Yet THE OBVIOUS SIMPLY IGNORED by one and all who contacted me over the years just as all (including family members) ELECTED / CHOSE TO IGNORE the blunt false instrument that was introduced 2 YEARS after the institution of the High Court action; the document simply used by the legal circles even though it was FORGED (year-date amended) before my own solicitor promoted the CREATED FORGED DOCUMENT, as legal / legitimate proof in support of an alleged / concocted defense in the High Court Action YIANNIDES (A&S Fashionables) -v- Radley Gowns Ltd (1970 – Chancery Division action – case). The photograph of the injuries I sustained care of a vicious bicycle chain strike after three secondary school thugs were directed to join me in a 329 Arriva bus and had their fun punching me, Andrew Yiannides. The assaults and the chain strike were recorded by the video equipment the bus was fitted with, thereby recording the orchestrated ASSAULTS AS ARRANGED BY THE POLICE. Needless to say, no copy of the video was given to me after the police impounded the evidence. Also NO PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SUSTAINED INJURIES OR ANY STATEMENT WAS SOUGHT / SECURED FROM THE TARGETED VICTIM (>Andrew Yiannides<) who was never invited to attend any trial of THE THREE USED THUGS, the created by the Metropolitan Police ‘seasoned & protected criminals’, >product-creations< of the mother of all allegedly civilized PSEUDO-Democracies, states / countries / societies resting and founded ALLEGEDLY on principles of Law & Order (>orders as concocted by allegedly judicious and honorable officers of the Justice System as created and maintained by the mother of ALL PSEUDO-Democracies<). The photograph, below, was taken in the course of the debate “Can We Trust The Judges?”, in the course of ‘The Festival of Rights Convention’ held in London last week in June & First week in July of 1995; the very debate when I was afforded the opportunity to submit my views and opinions after 23 years of research and study of the states imposed on Mr. & Mrs. Average sucker-serfs, as created and maintained by the mother of ALL PSEUDO-Democracies.


A. Yiannides, c/o 84 DUNBAR ROAD, London  N22 5BJ

Public Attendance to capacity & Attentive as the panel chair expression evinces

The Petition / DEMAND Straight to the point. The LAW IS THE LAW

RECIPIENTS OF PRINTED COPIES OF THE INDICTMENT / PETITION AS PRESENTED above are invited to complete and post their support to the above address. Readers / visitors to this specific article are invited / requested to download, print and complete the document as is. All who concern themselves either as victims of the abused courts facilities or as persons who witnessed and are aware of the arrogant abuse of the courts facilities are requested to pass on copies of the document as is after completing the requested information as created & REQUIRED below:-

Be Sociable, Share!


Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>