Recent Posts

Archive

The Ruling Pointed to as of the concept when first the material was published at the web-site human-rights.demon.co.uk

“..intentional wrongdoer … Liable… immaterial of date or any other date”

The ruling we point to, below, is very clear. It makes more than just common sense, when one reads it in conjunction with the obvious, which the case stated above covers.

“Where deceit was practiced by an intentional wrongdoer he was liable for the actual damage which directly flowed from the fraudulent inducement without reference to the transaction date or any other date, and foresee-ability of such damage was irrelevant”.

In a nutshell the wrongdoer who indulges in deceit / dishonesty / crime meets the costs of the original and all accrued damages whether or not the wrongdoer could foresee that damages would flow from the original wrongdoing. Consider the Court of Appeal ruling above and bear in mind the following factors:-

  1. The assertion and reliance, by an officer of law, that only if there had been evidence of any involvement or engagement in fraud or corrupt practices (for that matter) could there have been grounds leading to the indictment and the prosecution that secured a conviction under common law. Their Lordships, at the time, did not need to refer to any Act of Parliament to determine that an officer of law did act wrongly and in contempt of his duties to serve the law and the citizens
  2. The ruling, above, makes it abundantly clear that, when a person indulges in any act leading to pecuniary advantage and thefts of properties (including rights in law, do note) as covered by Acts of Parliament to which we point in our pages [*Link from here to an element covered by law, no one relates to] the person is liable for the original damages and the accrued consequential losses and damages.
  3. In the first case the offender merely negated in his duties to protect a member of the public from the consequences of criminal acts. In the second case what we have is an offender who indulged in wrongdoing for pecuniary advantage – for which you must refer to the page you can link to from the above paragraph.
  4. Consider, now all of the above issues and the most relevant issue of all. Citizens, pardon, the ‘serfs’, are constantly bombarded with : “Ignorance of the law is no defence”. The officer of the law in the first case, above, could not even have been considered as an ignorant of the law ‘serf’. However, how about the criminals who indulged in the procurement and the promotion of a false instrument, which they also made even falser by forging the date after they discovered that they had goofed? [*Link to the page where we relate briefly the criminal activities by the legal circles INCLUDING JUDICIAL CHAIR OCCUPANTS ALL THE WAY TO THE COURT OF APPEAL].
  5. EVEN BETTER for the ‘serfs’ to consider. How could any judicial chair occupant or police officer, who handled the false and forged instrument, EVER rely on ignorance of the law, when in fact they get their fat salaries, from our taxes, just to apply their knowledge of the law to the facts stated by the victims of crime and covered also in the theatres which they dare to promote as alleged courts of justice?
  6. Look up the word ‘jockey’ in any decent etymological dictionary. No one can possibly fail to recognise the implications that arise out of the crass arrogance of police officers and judicial chair occupants. They indulge in the most vile of crimes, because of and through their contempt of the law which they are retained to serve, as public(!) servants(?).
  7. Can anyone not agree with us that what we are faced with are nothing but Rampant Corruption Jockeys? (*F1 a most important element below)

Over to you, your Lordship, and to your dedicated team who allegedly is looking into complaints about judicial conduct.

The citizens, your Lordship, look to the Home Office and to the Home Secretary for protection (*Link) and for the police, under the command of the Home Office, to cease their vile activities, such as we point to in our pages.

We publish evidence that they rely on stooges and planted mischief makers who promote nothing but inexcusable and unjustified lies (*Link) created and promoted by the scam in the police forces in every corner of these islands, as in other parts of the world, that can be accessed in and through our pages.

WE, the pro-active citizens, do not rely on the stooges and the lap-dogs who serve their masters (*Link) from within the media. We are using our rights as provided under THE LAW. Your Lordship, neither you nor the persons whom YOU MAINTAIN IN OFFICE, as servants of the law and justice, and as alleged judicious persons, can go on ignoring the victims of the rampant fraud ongoing in and through the courts imposed on the misguided and misled sucker-serfs. We shall not be silenced.

We look to the elected, to our representatives in government, the House of Commons generally, irrespective of Party-Politics propaganda and false undertakings / promises, to ensure that all bad apples are made to >account, personally< THROUGH YOUR OFFICE and the department that meets their fat salaries, for the wrongs they imposed and impose on the ‘serfs’ whom they targeted and target in collaboration with the legal circles, including judicial chair occupants.

We look to the present government and its leader, also to all others who are legally qualified, to ensure that the undertaking, in 1995, to address the very issue of FRAUD IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM, is dealt with appropriately by the House of Commons; by  the elected representatives of the ‘citizens’.The citizens object to being treated as ‘serfs’ of the Middle Ages. The days of ‘you create and we take’, were and SHOULD HAVE BEEN laid by the wayside, when democracy was introduced to these islands.

We look to their Lordships >including the Law Lords< to come to terms with the fact that true Democracy is from the roots up and not from the leaves down (*Link). The other way round implies and amounts to dictatorship by abusers of the power of office, any office.

Public servants should be seen to be serving the citizens in accordance with the remit of their retainers and ALWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW.

Our founder wonders, if by any chance the French jurist Charles Louis Montesquieu was referring to these islands and the arrangements by the predecessors of the managers / organisers / planners of the lives of ‘the subjects’ when he coined:-

“When I go to a country, I do not look to see whether there are good laws, but whether those there are enforced, for good laws are everywhere”.

The argument at number 1 should cause all abusers of the public facilities, namely the staff and officers operating out of Haringey Council, also the police operating out of Haringey police, to reflect on their parts when ignoring and thereby endorsing  the constructively engineered theft and misappropriation of the Housing Benefit funds in collaboration with letting agencies staff and officers.

The evidence that was published in the public domain soon after abusers of judicial chair occupancy, operating out of Edmonton County Court, is now to be submitted to Justice Secretary Michael Gove who acknowledged the very issue of “British Justice IS & SHOULD BE IN THE DOCK”, at the Old Bailey. At least all solicitors, barristers and police officers who consciously engaged in or aided and abetted the organisers of the scams whether as part of the organised crime or as accessories and abettors after the acts,

In the last category class, naturally Commander Dr. Victor Olisa of Haringey police and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan Howe who shoved the evidence he received in the sand alongside the shreded and lost files that related to INVESTIGATIONS ATTACHED TO POLICE CORRUPTION, as acknowledged & reported by newspaper editors who received all the documented evidence. We had no option but to publish the evidence in the public domain, AS OF THE TIME WE WERE MADE AWARE & WE SECURED THE EVIDENCE, such as the FALSE LETTERS allegedly written to an Arab asylum seeker by the owner of a targeted property.

Haringey police, and the Metropolitan police had all the evidence that was needed to prosecute the offenders but as the misappropriated / stolen Housing Benefit Funds were shared by many, including …. shoving it all in the sand was the avenue chosen by alleged officers of the law and Justice as judicial chair occupants were seen to be party to the execution of the crimes.

Readers / visitors who might wish / desire to see some of the evidence such as THE THREE LETTERS which both the alleged author and the alleged recipient knew not of or had been aware of the creation and the promotion and use of such instruments. Worse still was the performance of the Chief Executive of Haringey Council. He did write to declare that the alleged recipient knew nothing of the letters which ONLY THE STAFF & OFFICERS OF Haringey Council and a Letting Agency spoke of and relied on use and promotion of the very FALSE INSTRUMENTS!!!

Access the three images of the letters, all bearing the very same photocopied signature at:-

http://www.uk-human-rights.org/haringey.htm

& pass on the information / point to the evidence and prepare for more evidence such as the letter to a judge who walked out of the court room and thus failed to face the challenges to DEAL WITH THE MATERIAL FACTS AS SOON AS THE CHALLENGES WERE PUT TO THE COURT (to the Judge)!!!

The challenges incidentally related to and attached to the abuse of a Legal Aid Certificate that was issued almost two decades ago.

FIVE SOLICITORS FAILED TO SERVE THE PERSON WHO NEEDED THE FACILITY for and in respect of a divorce and we will be releasing the evidence relative to the failures and THE BLACK ECONOMY, THE CASH UNDER THE TABLE FOR INVISIBLE SERVICES available from persons who do engage in such activities.

The very judge after the court clerk told the challenger and the victim of the ORGANISED HOUSING BENEFIT FRAUD to leave the court room, evidently returned to the court room (others who were intrigued with the performance of the judge, rushed out of the courtroom to find the challenger and the victim to whom they reported that the judge set out to create a false scenario. Apparently the judge attempted to enter and create false records in the court file such as the two, the challenger and victim walked out of the court of their own volition thereby creating FALSE RECORDS, intended to serve the plans of the abusers of the courts facilities, the parties who had been and were relying on such criminally motivated creations!!!

For readers / visitors who failed or faced any problems when trying to access any links pointed to from this article we copy below one of the most relevant. WE refer to the link from paragraph 4 where we refer to the false instrument (document) that was introduced and promoted by the solicitors in the High Court action case that opened the eyes of Andrew Yiannides  to the arrogant abuse of the courts facilities by the legal circles >solicitors & barristers<.

The most disturbing of the very issue was the fact that THE SOLICITOR WHO WAS ACTING FOR THE PLAINTIFF, for the victim of ARROGANT COMMERCIAL FRAUD (fraudulent in intent misrepresentations) WAS AN OLD SCHOOL FRIEND OF THE VICTIM OF THE FRAUD. And it was that very solicitor who presented the false instrument AFTER IT WAS ALSO FORGED as covered in the first web-pages the victim created after the police and judicial chair occupants within the Royal Courts of Justice, up to and including 2 Lord Justices, like THE POLICE & THE MEDIA ELECTED TO IGNORE THE FALSE& FORGED INSTRUMENT (intended to pervert and corrupt justice, while generating FRAUDULENTLY CREATED INCOME FOR THE SOLICITORS & THE BARRISTERS WHO WERE PROMOTING & USING THE FALSE & FORGED INSTRUMENT for both purposes.

The material copied and added below was called for on two counts.

A. The present fraudulently created states as imposed on Andrew Yiannides’ younger sister, Mrs Despina Englezakis.

&

B. The need to challenge & EXPOSE the abuse of the courts facilities FOR THE STATES imposed on Mrs Englezakis, the younger sister of Andrew Yiannides. Simply put the abuse of the courts facilities relate directly to the fact the her brother, namely Andrew Yiannides, determined to use his rights, as assured in National & International Law, to CHALLENGE & EXPOSE the criminal activities ongoing in and through abuse of the courts facilities.

A STATEMENT OF FACTS / AFFIDAVIT is presently to be delivered to the Lord Chancellor / Justice Secretary Michael Gove & the Home Secretary Theresa May, responsible for the failures of the police, to deal with the element of ORGANISED CRIME, such as were the cases of the abused courts facilities in the cases published >with the supporting evidence< in the public domain:-

1. www.uk-human-rights.org/haringey.htm where the issue of Housing Benefit funds theft and misappropriation were recorded by Andrew Yiannides and remain as reporded realities after the police recklessly failed to rexecute their public duties >AND PROTECT THE VICTIMS OF CRIME< such as the sister of Andrew Yiannides Mrs. Despina Englezakis was. The states imposed on Mrs Englrezakis were and renain simply extenmsions of the blint and arrogant failures by tghe police to address the criminal activities ongoing through abuse of the handling and the misappropriation of the Housing Benefit funds, which issue and elements the local County Court judicial chair occupants were complivit in. The very scenarios reminiscent of the High Court case that opened Andrew Yiannides’ eyes over 44 years ago.

&

B. The need and main reason WHY THE FRAUDULENTLY created states imposed on Mrs. Despina Englezakis who had been supportive of the long ongoing challenges & exposures on the Internet in the very area of ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES for many criminally imposed states such as the denial of judgements for and in respect of plundered & stolen, misappropriated Housing Benefit funds due and payable to the owners of properties occupied by the assisted including asylum seekers and refugees as covered with the documented evidence published on the Internet by Andrew Yiannides (the brother of the alleged Bankrupt Mrs Englezakis care of FALSE INSTRUMENTS LACKING ACCOUNTABILITY BY THE CREATORS & AUTHORS OF SUCH INSTRUMENTS (Court Orders) just as the case was that opened the eyes of Andrew Yiannides the brother of the alleged bankrupt who had no other choice but to USE HIS RIGHTS as assured in National & International LAW.

& International LAW.

The concluding words above relate to the failures of County Court Judges were when the case CONVENIENT FAILURES were used with intent in order to create / justify the alleged legitimately declared bankrupt state for the sister of Andrew Yiannides, who also was targeted for similar scenarios and states as the extensive material published in the web-pages where the documented evidence published in the public domain covering many an act of deliberate and inexcusable failures by judicial chair occupants who failed to address the issues presented to the courts as for instance in the case of the rogue builder who WAS USED by many an abuser of trust and more specifically the police (besides  the instigators / users of the rogue builder). The particular case, as published at:- www.human-rights.org/breeding.htm qualifies and clarifies the parts court clerical / office staff also engage in as persons who are used for the very parts they engage in as the evidence published in ‘The Breeding Grounds” case when the imposed states were created by abusers of the courts facilities.

The material copied and added to this article, below, was called for on two counts:-

A. To establish, ones and for all, the complicity of the media Intellectual Prostitutes who were to be ENDORSING THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES ONGOING AT & IN THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE noted AT THE TIME (1972-1976). Hence the reason why the victim of the abused courts facilities ceased reading what had been his chosen daily read as of 1953, ” The Manchester Guardian”, as related / covered in the article “Who, IF ANY, Cares?” published in respect of the systematic abuse of the courts facilities here at www.justiceraped.org

The convenient failures if the mediam in general, were considered to be offensive to comon sense,  in particular as of 1997 when the material facts (as copied herein below) were published at the first web-pages the victim of the original commercioal / business fraud and THE ENSUING FRAUDULENT IN INTENT COURT PROCEEDINGS THE VICTIM WAS SUBJECTED TO, CARE OF THE POLICE AND THE MEDIA who collectively were evrer since to be accessories and abettors to the ongoing criminal activities STARTING WITH THE REPORT TO THE POLICE WITHIN AN HOUR AFTER THE VICTIM SECURED A COPY OF THE OFFENDING DOCUMENT / FALSE INSTRUMENT EFOM THE SOLICITOR who attempted to cause the victim, of the fraud, to abandon hid High Cout Action against the r since the initial offenders / wrongdoers who later relied on the creation of the offending FALSE & FORGED DOCUMENT, used as an instrument in support of a concocted defence as the solicitors and Barristers who themselves were operating as SECONDARY OFFENDERS. Everything care of the police and the judicial chair occupants all the way and up to the Court of Appeal, at and within the Royal Courts of Justice, in London.

THe specific material FACTS RELATED / STATED AS PUBLISHED in the public domain added / copied below after 19 years of it all being ignored by the authorities care of the media who also appeared to ignore the arrogant abuse iof the courts facilities attached to FRAUDULENT IN INTENT COURT PROCEEDINGS. REference to the two letters published as part of the evidence that qualifies much towards the conclusion and the words of the present Lord Chancekllor / Justice Secretary Michael Gove who acknowledged and spoke of the very elements, the victim of the commercial fraudulent in intent court proceedings as the legal circles organised and arranged with judicial chair occupants could not under any pretext or excuse be spoken of in any other context but the very words used by the Justice Secretary, Michael Gove:- “BRITISH JUSTICE IN THE DOCK”.

In the last..

Be Sociable, Share!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>