By Andrew Yiannides
19 June 2008
A House of Lords ruling on record since 1940 on appeal from the Court of Appeal (1939) and solicitors with the blessings of the Law Society, the Police, Ministers and the media simply engage in RAMPANT FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS’ PROCESSES, all, care of condescending and participating in the arrogant fraud on ‘the serfs’: – the taxpayers.
|
Essential reading for all victims of solicitors and the legal circles / courts generally. Access the common factor that prevails in the system, from here. |
| The Jurisdiction of the Court to order a solicitor to pay the costs of proceedings is not limited to cases where he personally has been guilty of misconduct, but extends to a case where his managing clerk, to whom he has entrusted the necessary work, is guilty of misconduct, as for example, in the preparation of and filing of inadequate affidavits of documents. The jurisdiction is not limited to deal with cases of misconduct or default, but extends to the case where costs have been improperly incurred or without reasonable cause or have proved fruitless by reason of undue delay in proceeding under a judgement or order. | |
| An order for discovery requires the client to give information in writing and on oath of all documents which are or have been in his possession or power, whether he is bound to produce them or not, but as a client cannot be expected to realise the whole scope of that obligation without the aid and advice of his solicitor, the latter has a peculiar duty as an officer of the Court carefully to investigate the position, and, as far as possible, see that the order is complied with. The solicitor cannot simply allow the client to make whatever affidavit of documents he thinks fit, nor can he escape the responsibility of careful investigation or supervision. If the client will not give him the information which he is entitled to require, or if the client insists on swearing an affidavit which the solicitor knows to be imperfect, the solicitor’s duty is to withdraw from the case. A solicitor who has innocently put upon the file an affidavit by his client which he subsequently discovers to be false, owes a duty to the Court to put the matter right at the earliest moment if he continues to act as solicitor on the record. | |
| Decision of the Court of Appeal ( reported sub nom Myers v Rothfield [1939] IK B 109 ) reversed. Lord Russell of Killowen dissenting on the ground that the evidence submitted to the House failed in his opinion to establish any of the charges against the managing clerk, and, therefore, the order against the respondent could not stand. |
| **************************************** |
| (i) | Conspiracy - The crime of conspiracy to defraud takes place when two or more individuals agree to injure the rights of another. No further action is required. In practice, however, it is difficult to prove conspiracy unless the agreement to do something dishonest is put into effect. |
| (ii) | Dishonesty - acting dishonestly is an essential ingredient in the crime. In legal terms the knowledge of doing something wrong in relation to another person (whether overtly or covertly) constitutes dishonesty. Where covert action is concerned it may not be necessary to tell a lie or misrepresent the truth; a decision by someone who is aware of the true position to remain silent and in this way deprive an individual of his entitlement may constitute an implied lie or misrepresentation; and deliberate failure to correct a previous wrong interpretation of an individual’s entitlement which he took on trust almost certainly amounts to an implied lie. It is important to note that such action – or failure to act – constitutes dishonesty even if the person concerned believes in good faith that some valid public purpose is being served by it. |
| (iii) | To defraud – this is to deprive someone of something to which he is properly entitled; either directly or by implied lie or misrepresentation [*Link from here to the page where we rxpose ORGANISED COPNSTRUCTIVE FRAUD THROUGH ABUSE OF THE COURTS FACILITIES] |
Through the above deliberations and ruling / judgement their Lordships made it abundantly clear that solicitors owe a duty to the Court (to Justice in essence) to ensure that NO FALSEHOODS ARE ADVANCED, AIDED OR SUPPORTED by Officers of the Supreme Court. However, there exist the issues of power over others, greed and temptation, such as invitations to entertain criminally motivated and secured impositions on targeted parties. WE HAVE SUCH EVIDENCE; a barrister inviting through a deposition, an AFFIDAVIT SERVED & LODGED AT COURT, a Judge of the Supreme Court (RCJ – London) to ignore the law, and to ‘deny rights assured in law’ to a targeted serf, one, who, in accordance with the teachings by examples stated in the work of the creators of the alleged creator of all and everything, does NOT QUALIFY FOR JUSTICE, BECAUSE OF HIS BACKGROUND & BELIEFS. Such elements, years before the late Stephen Knight published his well-researched work on ‘The Brotherhood’, the Freemasons and activities by members who, apparently, merit no consideration by the hierarchy of ‘The Brotherhood’, as an offended ‘dissident’ spoke of to the researcher.
http://www.uk-human-rights.org/4suckers.htm#1940
PostScript
One leah@ has been submitting regular comments to articles posted at Justice Raped dot Org. The comments / compliments in no way constitute submisssions or relevant comments / challenges that relate to the content of the articles.
ALL the person aims at, through use of the comments facility happen to be ‘the import of spam laced with adverts’, for free and earnings.
The person failed to note that our systems have been picking up on the attempts and submit them to the administrators for editorial attention. The person among the compliments intended to secure aproval for release ‘if passed by the system’s security / separation of spam from genuine interests OR CRITICISM, which we welcome, failed to recognise that we are not interested in idle comment compliments.
Postings clearly intended to secure promotion of some financial rewards facility for posting such unrelated material as an alleged video attached to the article above, are but a sick joke.
Grow up Leah.
Diogenis
When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Many thanks!
Hello! I’ve been following your blog and articles for some time now and, finally I got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Austin Texas! Just wanted to say keep up the excellent work!
>>>NOTE:- Links to commercial interests far removed from the material facts and the realities we challenge and expose, in the public domain, are not unaccepted. We shall entertain only links to websites that challenge and expose any violations of rights which the authorities are directly or indirectly responsible for; indirectly relates to failures of the authorities to prosecute deceivers who cheat, steal and plunder as seasoned criminals while the authorities turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to the sufferings of the victims.< <<
I am often into blogging and I really appreciate your content. This article has really peaked my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking here for new information.
>>>NOTE:- Links to commercial interest promotions removed. We do not approve of such, and we repeat that only links to websites serving as we do, the interests of Mr & Mrs Average, the deceived and cheated out of their rights citizens shall be and are entertained here. We welcome also links to websites EXPOSING VIOLATIONS OF RIGHTS by and from within government departments and officially approved FALSE FRONTS, such as the many exposed by and at http://www.human-rights.org/4deceit.htm#letter < <<
I am often to blogging and I really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new material and information.
>>>NOTE:- Promotion of commercial / financial interests REMOVED for obvious reasons. The article relates to blunt and arrogant fraud by the legal circles and as such, we expect and DEMAND of anyone who purportedly bothered to read the article to address the issues covered by the article or to point to some / any other website where similar issues / criminal activities are covered, challenged and exposed >period< . Visitors are urged to access the evidence published in the public domain qualifying HOW HIGH THE FRAUD ON THE TAX PAYERS IN PSEUDOdemocracies & how the CORRUPTION OF SOCIETY IS ARRANGED BY ALLEGED SERVANTS OF THE LAW & JUCTICE [Link].
I was suggested this web site through my cousin. I’m not positive whether or not this post is written by means of him as no one else know such particular approximately my problem. You are wonderful! Thanks!
>>>NOTE:- Links to commercial interest promotions removed because of the fact that the material pointed to in no way related / relates to the issues covered at this website. The visitor writes greenhorn; anyone who ever retained a solicitor gets to recognise of the realities we expose early on in any relationship with the legal circles.<<<
This is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!
>>>NOTE: Commercial interests promotions removed for obvious reasons. Our work and presence in the public domain relates to OUR AIMS to inform the sucker-serfs who have taxes imposed on them for the cost of maintaining criminals in public office and abusers of judicial chair occupation who indulge in the type of ORGANISED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUDS (plural intended) SUCH AS Andrew Yiannides was subjected to, throughout 1972-1976* [*Link 1]
&
Subsequently*. [*Link 2]. <<<
This is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!
>>>NOTE promotions of unrelated material removed<<<.
With quality information like this, I guess your web site can become a masterpiece among your fellow competitors’ websites. I really believe that bookmarking your website won’t be a waste of time. Please, do continue adding interesting posts!
>>>NOTE:- So long as visitors pass on to their contacts such views and opinions, we know that the information and the realities we point to, shall achieve our intended goal. Thus and thereby the AWAKENED and THE WELL INFORMED CITIZENS OF THE PLANET shall question the theatrical productions the politicians relentlessly create. We look to the well informed, the awakened, to go about questioning the Intellectual Prostitutes and the Media Barons >the suppressors of the truths we point to< . We look forward to awakened emerging as the power and the light source for the beacons of salvation. We point out, yet again, that promotion of commercial interests has no part in our plans and we 'consider such activities to be of negative value and force; HOW the many dreamers we name and point to, converted to lovers and promoters of the evil forces at work as clarified in the web-page:- http://human-rights.org/confraud.htm#records <<<
You made some decent points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and found most individuals will go along with with your website.
>>>NOTE: Commercial interest promotions removed. Our presence in the public domain relates to the fact that the public has, for centuries, been misinformed, lied to and deceived by abusers of trust and it starts with education as qualified at the explicit webpage *linked to from here.<<<
One of the many visitors who visited this and other pages using the email name of leah@…, left a number of appreciative and complimentary ‘comments’. All were laced with spam’ and our system pointed out the person’s aims.
Leah, whoever you are; give it up and, if you are a person and not some programmed robot, at the very least, ensure that your comments DO actually relate to the material you have read.
Diogenis